Abstract
Field experiment was conducted during kharif 2017 and 2018 to study the effect of nutrient management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of pearl millet intercropped in Melia dubia (Agri-silvi system). The experiment consisted of eight treatments and laid out in randomised block design with three replications. The treatments are T1-Control (no fertilizer and manure), T2-100% RDF through normal urea, T3-100% RDF through neem coated urea, T4 75% RD N + 25% N through Poultry manure, T5 75% RD N + 25% N through FYM, T6 75% RD N + Pongamia green leaf manure @ 10 t ha-1, T7 75% RD N + Azotobacter @ 500 g ha-1, T8 Sole crop without trees (100% RDF). Results of the experiment showed that sole crop of pearl millet recorded significantly higher grain yield, stover yield and nutrient uptake followed by 100% RDF through neem coated urea under Melia dubia. Among the integrated nutrient management treatments 75% RD N + Pongamia green leaf manure @ 10 t ha-1 registered higher yield and nutrient uptake of pearl millet compared to other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearl millet cropping had significantly higher grain and stover yield than the Melia intercrop treatments.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Treatment
- sole crope0
- Outcome
- grain yield, stover yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- under Melia dubiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sole crop of pearl millet recorded significantly higher grain yield, stover yield and nutrient uptake followed by 100% RDF through neem coated urea under Melia dubia”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearl millet cropping had significantly higher nutrient uptake than the Melia intercrop treatments.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- sole crope0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- under Melia dubiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sole crop of pearl millet recorded significantly higher grain yield, stover yield and nutrient uptake followed by 100% RDF through neem coated urea under Melia dubia”
Claim · model-written summary
Under Melia dubia, 100% RDF through neem coated urea ranked behind sole cropping in pearl millet yield and nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF through neem coated ureae0
- Outcome
- grain yield, stover yield and nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- sole crop of pearl millete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sole crop of pearl millet recorded significantly higher grain yield, stover yield and nutrient uptake followed by 100% RDF through neem coated urea under Melia dubia”
Claim · model-written summary
Among integrated nutrient management treatments, the Pongamia green leaf manure treatment had higher pearl millet yield and nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- 75% RD N + Pongamia green leaf manure @ 10 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- yield and nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“75% RD N + Pongamia green leaf manure @ 10 t ha-1 registered higher yield and nutrient uptake of pearl millet compared to other treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Pongamia · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
255 papers more in this group
See all 259 papers →intercropping · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.