Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of different soil agro-techniques on leaf nutrient status of peach grown in a replant sick soil

Kishore Kumar Thakur; D.P. Sharma

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Peach replant disease (PRD) is a complex syndrome typified by stunted growth and reduced yields in repeated cultivation of peach in old orchard sites. PRD is associated with several biotic and abiotic causes; its symptoms are vague and highly variable by sites under different environmental conditions; making it difficult to diagnose and overcome. In this experiment; we studied the effect of different replant soil treatments for controlling PRD in site preciously planted to peach for >30 years. We compared six replant soil treatments including 3 variants viz., soil fumigation, PGPR and biocontrol in 5 different combos and a control (i.e. Recommended package of practices); each with four replications. The different soil management practices significantly (p<0.05) affected leaf nutrients content of peach plants grown in a replanted site. The results from this study provide evidence that combined treatment (Soil fumigation +PGPR +Biocontrol+25% more of recommended SSP) helped improving the total mineral nutrient status and thus may alleviate replant problem in peach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil management significantly affected peach leaf nutrient content.

Treatment
different soil management practicese0
Outcome
leaf nutrients contente0
Setting
replanted sitee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different soil management practices significantly (p<0.05) affected leaf nutrients content of peach plants grown in a replanted site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil treatment improved total mineral nutrient status of peach.

Treatment
Soil fumigation +PGPR +Biocontrol+25% more of recommended SSPe0
Outcome
total mineral nutrient statuse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined treatment (Soil fumigation +PGPR +Biocontrol+25% more of recommended SSP) helped improving the total mineral nutrient status and thus may alleviate replant problem in peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1078 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the combined treatment may alleviate the peach replant problem.

Treatment
Soil fumigation +PGPR +Biocontrol+25% more of recommended SSPe0
Outcome
may alleviate replant probleme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined treatment (Soil fumigation +PGPR +Biocontrol+25% more of recommended SSP) helped improving the total mineral nutrient status and thus may alleviate replant problem in peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1078 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.