Paper · 2020 · Microbiome

Nanoparticle treatment of maize analyzed through the metatranscriptome: compromised nitrogen cycling, possible phytopathogen selection, and plant hormesis

Wouter M. A. Sillen; Sofie Thijs; Gennaro Roberto Abbamondi; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background The beneficial use of nanoparticle silver or nanosilver may be confounded when its potent antimicrobial properties impact non-target members of natural microbiomes such as those present in soil or the plant rhizosphere. Agricultural soils are a likely sink for nanosilver due to its presence in agrochemicals and land-applied biosolids, but a complete assessment of nanosilver’s effects on this environment is lacking because the impact on the natural soil microbiome is not known. In a study assessing the use of nanosilver for phytopathogen control with maize, we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days. Results We found several unintended effects of nanosilver which could interfere with agricultural systems in the long term. Firstly, the archaea community was negatively impacted with a more than 30% decrease in relative abundance, and as such, their involvement in nitrogen cycling and specifically, nitrification, was compromised. Secondly, certain potentially phytopathogenic fungal groups showed significantly increased abundances, possibly due to the negative effects of nanosilver on bacteria exerting natural biocontrol against these fungi as indicated by negative interactions in a network analysis. Up to 5-fold increases in relative abundance have been observed for certain possibly phytopathogenic fungal genera. Lastly, nanosilver exposure also caused a direct physiological impact on maize as illustrated by increased transcript abundance of aquaporin and phytohormone genes, overall resulting in a stress level with the potential to yield hormetically stimulated plant root growth. Conclusions This study indicates the occurrence of significant unintended effects of nanosilver use on corn, which could turn out to be negative to crop productivity and ecosystem health in the long term. We therefore highlight the need to include the microbiome when assessing the risk associated with nano-enabled agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilver exposure in soil decreased the archaea community by more than 30% in relative abundance in the maize rhizosphere.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanosilvere0
Outcome
archaea communitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
more than 30%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“the archaea community was negatively impacted with a more than 30% decrease in relative abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilver compromised the involvement of archaea in nitrogen cycling and nitrification, as the authors infer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanosilvere0
Outcome
involvement in nitrogen cycling and specifically, nitrificatione2
Direction
compromisede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e2

“as such, their involvement in nitrogen cycling and specifically, nitrification, was compromised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Certain potentially phytopathogenic fungal groups showed significantly increased abundances after nanosilver exposure in maize rhizosphere soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanosilvere0
Interactor
potentially phytopathogenic fungal groupse3pathogen
Outcome
abundancese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e3

“certain potentially phytopathogenic fungal groups showed significantly increased abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundance of certain possibly phytopathogenic fungal genera increased up to 5-fold after nanosilver exposure.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanosilvere0
Interactor
possibly phytopathogenic fungal generae4pathogen
Outcome
relative abundancee4
Direction
increasese4
Value
Up to 5-folde4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e4

“Up to 5-fold increases in relative abundance have been observed for certain possibly phytopathogenic fungal genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1488 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in potentially phytopathogenic fungi is possibly due to negative effects of nanosilver on bacteria that exert natural biocontrol against them.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanosilvere5
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
increased abundancese3
Qualifier
possibly due to the negative effects of nanosilver on bacteria exerting natural biocontrol against these fungie5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e3

“certain potentially phytopathogenic fungal groups showed significantly increased abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1200 · show in text ↑
e5

“possibly due to the negative effects of nanosilver on bacteria exerting natural biocontrol against these fungi as indicated by negative interactions in a network analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1372 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A network analysis showed negative interactions between bacteria and fungi in the maize rhizosphere.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae5other
Outcome
negative interactions in a network analysise5
Direction
negativee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e5

“possibly due to the negative effects of nanosilver on bacteria exerting natural biocontrol against these fungi as indicated by negative interactions in a network analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilver exposure increased transcript abundance of aquaporin and phytohormone genes in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanosilver exposuree7
Gene
aquaporin and phytohormone genese7
Outcome
transcript abundancee7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e7

“nanosilver exposure also caused a direct physiological impact on maize as illustrated by increased transcript abundance of aquaporin and phytohormone genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilver exposure may stimulate maize root growth through hormesis, as the authors suggest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
nanosilvere0
Outcome
plant root growthe1
Direction
stimulatede1
Qualifier
hormeticallye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we analyzed the metatranscriptome of the maize rhizosphere and observed multiple unintended effects of exposure to 100 mg kg −1 nanosilver in soil during a growth period of 117 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“overall resulting in a stress level with the potential to yield hormetically stimulated plant root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1760 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend including the microbiome when assessing the risk of nano-enabled agriculture.

Outcome
the need to include the microbiome when assessing the riske2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study indicates the occurrence of significant unintended effects of nanosilver use on corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1869 · show in text ↑
e2

“We therefore highlight the need to include the microbiome when assessing the risk associated with nano-enabled agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2089 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 161 positive, 21 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.