Abstract
The experiment was carried out in Al-Musayab Technical Collage – Babylon governet for the years 2010/2011 on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar in order to study the effect of irrigation water source (river water ، ، ground waterA,B and drainage waterA and B ), and effect of foliar fertilization by Polixal with the concentrations (0 , 4 and 8 cm3L-1) and effect of interaction in the shoot and root properties and in addition to the leaf contents of the mineral elements.factorial experiment in complete randomized block design with three replicates in 15 treatments was carried out. Mean differences tests according to least significant different (LSD) on 0.05 probability level was used. results of this study was as follows: Significant domination of irrigated olive seedling with river water and treatment with ground water in all other water sources, in most vegetative and roots growth under study،also this treatment dominate in the contents of Nitrogen, calcium and magnesium, and decreases the leaf content of sodium, chloride and proline compare with Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1) which reduced all growth parameters and contents of leaves from the mineral element, but it was increase the rate of sodium, chloreide and proline. Spraying with polixal (8cm3 L-1) caused Significantly domination in all studied characteristic. also decreases contents of leaves from sodium, chloreide and proline.The interaction of the irrigation with river water or grounds water with spraying by 8 cm3 L-1 polixal significantly in all characteristic including the mineral content of the leaves and decrease the proline and contents of leaf from non - essential the (sodium and chloride)
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
River or ground water irrigation improved olive vegetative and root growth relative to other water sources.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeae0 - Treatment
- river water and treatment with ground watere0
- Outcome
- vegetative and roots growthe0
- Direction
- dominatione0
- Comparator
- all other water sourcese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant domination of irrigated olive seedling with river water and treatment with ground water in all other water sources, in most vegetative and roots growth under study”
Claim · model-written summary
River or ground water irrigation increased olive leaf nitrogen, calcium and magnesium relative to drainage irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- river water and treatment with ground watere1
- Outcome
- contents of Nitrogen, calcium and magnesiume0
- Direction
- dominatee0
- Comparator
- Drainage irrigation treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“also this treatment dominate in the contents of Nitrogen, calcium and magnesium, and decreases the leaf content of sodium, chloride and proline compare with Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1)”
e1“irrigated olive seedling with river water and treatment with ground water”
Claim · model-written summary
River or ground water irrigation decreased olive leaf sodium, chloride and proline relative to drainage irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- river water and treatment with ground watere1
- Outcome
- leaf content of sodium, chloride and prolinee0
- Direction
- decreasese0
- Comparator
- Drainage irrigation treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“also this treatment dominate in the contents of Nitrogen, calcium and magnesium, and decreases the leaf content of sodium, chloride and proline compare with Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1)”
e1“irrigated olive seedling with river water and treatment with ground water”
Claim · model-written summary
Drainage irrigation reduced olive growth parameters and leaf mineral contents.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1)e0
- Outcome
- all growth parameters and contents of leaves from the mineral elemente0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1) which reduced all growth parameters and contents of leaves from the mineral element”
e1“on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Drainage irrigation increased olive leaf sodium, chloride and proline.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae2
- Treatment
- Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1)e1
- Outcome
- rate of sodium, chloreide and prolinee0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but it was increase the rate of sodium, chloreide and proline.”
e1“Drainage irrigation treatment (9.11 ds.m-1)”
e2“on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Polixal spraying at 8 cm3 L-1 improved all studied olive seedling characteristics.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- Spraying with polixal (8cm3 L-1)e0
- Outcome
- all studied characteristice0
- Direction
- dominatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying with polixal (8cm3 L-1) caused Significantly domination in all studied characteristic.”
e1“on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Polixal spraying at 8 cm3 L-1 decreased olive leaf sodium, chloride and proline.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- Spraying with polixal (8cm3 L-1)e0
- Outcome
- contents of leaves from sodium, chloreide and prolinee0
- Direction
- decreasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying with polixal (8cm3 L-1) caused Significantly domination in all studied characteristic. also decreases contents of leaves from sodium, chloreide and proline.”
e1“on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining river or ground water irrigation with 8 cm3 L-1 Polixal spraying significantly improved olive characteristics, including leaf mineral content.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- irrigation with river water or grounds water with spraying by 8 cm3 L-1 polixale0
- Outcome
- all characteristic including the mineral content of the leavese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction of the irrigation with river water or grounds water with spraying by 8 cm3 L-1 polixal significantly in all characteristic including the mineral content of the leaves”
e1“on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining river or ground water irrigation with 8 cm3 L-1 Polixal spraying decreased olive leaf proline, sodium and chloride.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae1
- Treatment
- irrigation with river water or grounds water with spraying by 8 cm3 L-1 polixale0
- Outcome
- proline and contents of leaf from non - essential the (sodium and chloride)e0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction of the irrigation with river water or grounds water with spraying by 8 cm3 L-1 polixal significantly in all characteristic including the mineral content of the leaves and decrease the proline and contents of leaf from non - essential the (sodium and chloride)”
e1“on the olive seedling of Khestawe cultivar”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
irrigation · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · physiology: osmolytes · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
18 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.