Abstract
The field experiment was conducted at Al-Salam International for Development and Agricultural Investment private farm at 64 Kilometer (Cairo- Alexandria Desert Road), Egypt to study the effect of magnetic saline irrigation water (MW) and soil amendments; magnetic iron (MI) and Nile fertile (NF); on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics, nutrients statues in leaves, fruits and some soil properties, besides proline content in the leaves and fruits of Kalamata olive trees under soil salinity of 3430 ppm and water salinity of 3904 ppm during two successive seasons (2016-2017 and 2017-2018), and productivity at three seasons (2016-2017 / 2017-2018 and 2018-2019). The results showed that, MW and MI+NF enhanced vegetative growth significantly (shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area), number of fruits/shoot, total yield/tree and fruit physical characteristics, as well as macro and micro nutrients content in leaves, fruits and soil during 1st and 2nd seasons. Proline content of leaves and fruits decreased in all treatments received (MW) compared to those of non magnetic saline irrigation (NMW). These results performed that, the soil irrigated with MW and amended with MI and Nile fertile achieved net income of about 36362.5 LE fed-1 (average tow growing seasons 2017 and 2018) for the olive grower in comparison with other treatments. It could be recommended to use MW and fertilization with MI (500 g/tree) +NF (2 kg/tree/year) under 3430 ppm soil salinity of and 3904 ppm water salinity to decrease salinity and enhance vegetative growth, yield characteristics and increase net income of Kalamata olive trees.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
MW and MI+NF significantly enhanced olive shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MW and MI+NFe0
- Outcome
- shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface areae0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MW and MI+NF enhanced vegetative growth significantly (shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area)”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW and MI+NF enhanced the number of fruits per shoot.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MW and MI+NFe0
- Outcome
- number of fruits/shoote0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MW and MI+NF enhanced vegetative growth significantly (shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area), number of fruits/shoot, total yield/tree and fruit physical characteristics”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW and MI+NF enhanced total olive yield per tree.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MW and MI+NFe0
- Outcome
- total yield/treee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MW and MI+NF enhanced vegetative growth significantly (shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area), number of fruits/shoot, total yield/tree and fruit physical characteristics”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW and MI+NF enhanced olive fruit physical characteristics.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MW and MI+NFe0
- Outcome
- fruit physical characteristicse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MW and MI+NF enhanced vegetative growth significantly (shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area), number of fruits/shoot, total yield/tree and fruit physical characteristics”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW and MI+NF enhanced macro and micro nutrient content in olive leaves, fruits and soil in the first two seasons.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MW and MI+NFe0
- Outcome
- macro and micro nutrients content in leaves, fruits and soile0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Qualifier
- during 1st and 2nd seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MW and MI+NF enhanced vegetative growth significantly (shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area), number of fruits/shoot, total yield/tree and fruit physical characteristics, as well as macro and micro nutrients content in leaves, fruits and soil during 1st and 2nd seasons”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW decreased proline content of olive leaves relative to non magnetic saline irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MWe0
- Outcome
- Proline content of leavese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- non magnetic saline irrigation (NMW)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Proline content of leaves and fruits decreased in all treatments received (MW) compared to those of non magnetic saline irrigation (NMW)”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW decreased proline content of olive fruits relative to non magnetic saline irrigation.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- MWe0
- Outcome
- Proline content of leaves and fruitse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- non magnetic saline irrigation (NMW)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Proline content of leaves and fruits decreased in all treatments received (MW) compared to those of non magnetic saline irrigation (NMW)”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
MW irrigation with MI and Nile fertile produced about 36362.5 LE fed-1 net income for olive growers, compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Kalamatat0
- Treatment
- irrigated with MW and amended with MI and Nile fertilee0
- Outcome
- net incomee0
- Direction
- achievede0
- Value
- 36362.5 LE fed-1e0
- Qualifier
- average tow growing seasons 2017 and 2018e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the soil irrigated with MW and amended with MI and Nile fertile achieved net income of about 36362.5 LE fed-1 (average tow growing seasons 2017 and 2018) for the olive grower in comparison with other treatments”
t0“Kalamata olive cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend MW with MI and NF under the stated salinity conditions to lower salinity and improve growth, yield characteristics and income.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeae0
- Material
- Kalamatae0
- Outcome
- use MW and fertilization with MI (500 g/tree) +NF (2 kg/tree/year)e0
- Qualifier
- under 3430 ppm soil salinity of and 3904 ppm water salinitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It could be recommended to use MW and fertilization with MI (500 g/tree) +NF (2 kg/tree/year) under 3430 ppm soil salinity of and 3904 ppm water salinity to decrease salinity and enhance vegetative growth, yield characteristics and increase net income of Kalamata olive trees”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
iron atom · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
iron atom · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →irrigation · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
irrigation · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.