Intervention effectmodel-written summary

By 8 weeks AFB, deficit irrigated fruit had completed only 40% of endocarp growth.

A claim from The Effect of Water Deficit during Early Fruit Development on Olive Fruit Morphogenesis · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 8 weeks AFB, deficit irrigated fruit had completed only 40% of endocarp growth.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeat0
Treatment
deficit irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
endocarp growthe0
Direction
onlye0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
irrigated treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ninety percent of endocarp growth had occurred by 8 weeks AFB in the irrigated treatment, but only 40% when the deficit irrigation treatment was imposed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1584
t0

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123

Title

The Effect of Water Deficit during Early Fruit Development on Olive Fruit Morphogenesis

Hava F. Rapoport; Giacomo Costagli; Riccardo Gucci Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2004. doi:10.21273/jashs.129.1.0121

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e86ad1e6fdb8e8e77cfd038dcba646a6d74d6e44a90afe063de2bf1d460af232 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

44 papers: 22 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.