Abstract
This experiment was carried out during the planting season of 2021-2022 in one of the private fields for olive cultivation in the city of Rawa located in the village of (Abu Koi) of the Western Desert of Anbar, to study the effect of foliar nutrition with chelated iron (CHI0, CHI1 and CHI2) at three levels of concentrations 0, 100, 200 mg L-1 in the tree, and dry yeast suspension (DYE0, DYE1, and DYE2) at three levels of concentration 0, 10, 20 g L-1 and the interaction between them its effect on vegetative growth and fruit characters of olive trees (var. Ashrassi). The trees were sprayed three times in a row, the first spray was in April, and the following sprays were 30 days apart. The results showed that the effect of foliar application with chelated iron for CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1 showed that there were significant differences the increase in branch length amounted to 90.97 cm, the increase in the length of the fruit is 21.33 mm, the weight of the flesh of the fruit is 5.38 g, the weight of the kernel is 0.77 g. While for factor the suspension of dry yeast, the treatment DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1 was significantly superior in increasing the length of the branch 84.25 cm, increase in the length of the fruit 21.02 mm, the weight of the flesh of the fruit 5.63 g, the weight of the kernel 0.78 g, dry matter in leaves 51.21%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar chelated iron at 200 mg L-1 significantly increased olive branch length to 90.97 cm.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- chelated iron for CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e0
- Outcome
- branch lengthe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 90.97 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar application with chelated iron for CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1 showed that there were significant differences the increase in branch length amounted to 90.97 cm”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
The same iron treatment increased fruit length to 21.33 mm.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e1
- Outcome
- length of the fruite0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 21.33 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the increase in the length of the fruit is 21.33 mm”
e1“CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
The same iron treatment yielded fruit flesh weight of 5.38 g.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e1
- Outcome
- weight of the flesh of the fruite0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 5.38 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the weight of the flesh of the fruit is 5.38 g”
e1“CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
The same iron treatment yielded kernel weight of 0.77 g.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e1
- Outcome
- weight of the kernele0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 0.77 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the weight of the kernel is 0.77 g”
e1“CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 significantly increased olive branch length to 84.25 cm.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e0
- Outcome
- length of the branche0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 84.25 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the treatment DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1 was significantly superior in increasing the length of the branch 84.25 cm”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 increased olive fruit length to 21.02 mm.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
- Outcome
- length of the fruite0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 21.02 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“increase in the length of the fruit 21.02 mm”
e1“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 yielded olive fruit flesh weight of 5.63 g.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
- Outcome
- weight of the flesh of the fruite0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 5.63 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the weight of the flesh of the fruit 5.63 g”
e1“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 yielded olive kernel weight of 0.78 g.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
- Outcome
- weight of the kernele0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 0.78 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the weight of the kernel 0.78 g”
e1“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 produced olive leaf dry matter of 51.21%.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
- Outcome
- dry matter in leavese0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 51.21%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“dry matter in leaves 51.21%”
e1“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”
t0“Olive Trees”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.