Paper · 2022 · Iraqi Journal of Desert Studies

The Effect of Foliar Feeding with Chelated Iron and a Suspension of Dry Yeast on The Vegetative and Fruitful Growth Characteristics of Olive Trees, Cultivar Ashrsi

Rasha Hamu alrawi; Rasmi Al- Dulaimi

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment was carried out during the planting season of 2021-2022 in one of the private fields for olive cultivation in the city of Rawa located in the village of (Abu Koi) of the Western Desert of Anbar, to study the effect of foliar nutrition with chelated iron (CHI0, CHI1 and CHI2) at three levels of concentrations 0, 100, 200 mg L-1 in the tree, and dry yeast suspension (DYE0, DYE1, and DYE2) at three levels of concentration 0, 10, 20 g L-1 and the interaction between them its effect on vegetative growth and fruit characters of olive trees (var. Ashrassi). The trees were sprayed three times in a row, the first spray was in April, and the following sprays were 30 days apart. The results showed that the effect of foliar application with chelated iron for CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1 showed that there were significant differences the increase in branch length amounted to 90.97 cm, the increase in the length of the fruit is 21.33 mm, the weight of the flesh of the fruit is 5.38 g, the weight of the kernel is 0.77 g. While for factor the suspension of dry yeast, the treatment DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1 was significantly superior in increasing the length of the branch 84.25 cm, increase in the length of the fruit 21.02 mm, the weight of the flesh of the fruit 5.63 g, the weight of the kernel 0.78 g, dry matter in leaves 51.21%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar chelated iron at 200 mg L-1 significantly increased olive branch length to 90.97 cm.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
chelated iron for CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e0
Outcome
branch lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
90.97 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application with chelated iron for CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1 showed that there were significant differences the increase in branch length amounted to 90.97 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same iron treatment increased fruit length to 21.33 mm.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e1
Outcome
length of the fruite0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.33 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in the length of the fruit is 21.33 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same iron treatment yielded fruit flesh weight of 5.38 g.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e1
Outcome
weight of the flesh of the fruite0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
5.38 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of the flesh of the fruit is 5.38 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same iron treatment yielded kernel weight of 0.77 g.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1e1
Outcome
weight of the kernele0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.77 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of the kernel is 0.77 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“CHI2 treatment at a concentration of 200 mg L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 significantly increased olive branch length to 84.25 cm.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e0
Outcome
length of the branche0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
84.25 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1 was significantly superior in increasing the length of the branch 84.25 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 increased olive fruit length to 21.02 mm.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
Outcome
length of the fruite0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.02 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the length of the fruit 21.02 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 yielded olive fruit flesh weight of 5.63 g.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
Outcome
weight of the flesh of the fruite0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
5.63 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of the flesh of the fruit 5.63 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 yielded olive kernel weight of 0.78 g.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
Outcome
weight of the kernele0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.78 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of the kernel 0.78 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1351 · show in text ↑
e1

“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast at 20 g L-1 produced olive leaf dry matter of 51.21%.

Taxon
Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1e1
Outcome
dry matter in leavese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
51.21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter in leaves 51.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“DYE2 at a concentration of 20 g L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.