Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Influence of post emergence application of glyphosate on crop phytotoxicity and soil microbial status in transgenic maize

D. Ravisankar; C. Chinnusamy; P. Muthukrishnan

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the weed and crop phytotoxicity and soil weed seed bank of transgenic stacked maize hybrids named Hishell and 900 M Gold and the treatments were, glyphosate as early post emergence application (POE) at 900, 1800 and 3600 g a.e ha-1 compared with non-transgenic counterpart maize hybrids applied with pre-emergence (PE) atrazine at 0.5 kg ha-1 followed by one hand weeding (HW) on 40 DAS and with and without insect management. The results revealed that the rate of phytotoxicity development and time to destruction of weeds was increased over the increase of glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1 without affecting the crop growth. Post emergence application of glyphosate at 900 and 1800 g a.e ha-1 in herbicide tolerant transgenic maize resulted in more number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes. Whereas, in higher dose (3600 g a.e ha-1) initial reduction of microbial population was observed and it recovered within 45 days after glyphosate spraying. PE application of atrazine exerted a significant detrimental effect on soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes and reduced the microbial count in herbicide treated plots upto 30 DAHS. Thereafter, microbial population started to recover slowly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing glyphosate dose increased the rate of weed phytotoxicity and weed destruction.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
phytotoxicity development and time to destruction of weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
900 g a.e ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of phytotoxicity development and time to destruction of weeds was increased over the increase of glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing glyphosate dose did not affect maize growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1e0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1 without affecting the crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 900 g a.e ha-1 increased soil bacterial, fungal and actinomycete counts in herbicide tolerant maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
glyphosate at 900e0
Outcome
number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetese0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate at 900 and 1800 g a.e ha-1 in herbicide tolerant transgenic maize resulted in more number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 1800 g a.e ha-1 increased soil bacterial, fungal and actinomycete counts in herbicide tolerant maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
1800 g a.e ha-1e0
Outcome
number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetese0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate at 900 and 1800 g a.e ha-1 in herbicide tolerant transgenic maize resulted in more number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high glyphosate dose initially reduced soil microbial populations, which recovered within 45 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
3600 g a.e ha-1e0
Outcome
microbial populatione0
Direction
initial reductione0
Qualifier
recovered within 45 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher dose (3600 g a.e ha-1) initial reduction of microbial population was observed and it recovered within 45 days after glyphosate spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence atrazine significantly reduced soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes for up to 30 days after spraying.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
PE application of atrazinee0
Outcome
soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
upto 30 DAHSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PE application of atrazine exerted a significant detrimental effect on soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes and reduced the microbial count in herbicide treated plots upto 30 DAHS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial populations began to recover after 30 days following atrazine treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
PE application of atrazinee1
Outcome
microbial populatione0
Direction
recovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thereafter, microbial population started to recover slowly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“PE application of atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.