Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing glyphosate dose increased the rate of weed phytotoxicity and weed destruction.

A claim from Influence of post emergence application of glyphosate on crop phytotoxicity and soil microbial status in transgenic maize · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing glyphosate dose increased the rate of weed phytotoxicity and weed destruction.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
phytotoxicity development and time to destruction of weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
900 g a.e ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of phytotoxicity development and time to destruction of weeds was increased over the increase of glyphosate doses from 900 g a.e ha-1 to 3600 g a.e ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–706
t0

“transgenic maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121

Title

Influence of post emergence application of glyphosate on crop phytotoxicity and soil microbial status in transgenic maize

D. Ravisankar; C. Chinnusamy; P. Muthukrishnan International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5f0e487e8214e2fb7d4105ea15475a44a3b2f166d86aeb7c3934325aefa36b7d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.