Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of fertigation and soil application of major nutrients on growth and yield of pomegranate cv. Bhagwa

Nekha Thanari; R Suma

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted during hasta bahar season of 2015- 2016 on four year old pomegranate orchard cultivating Bhagwa variety to find out the effect of fertigation of major nutrients on the growth and yield of pomegranate. The experiment comprised of six treatments with four replication that included application of 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through soil application (T1) and fertigation (T6), supplementing 50 per cent (T2 and T3) and 75 per cent (T4 and T5) RDF through fertigation following two different nutrient application schedule. The highest plant height and canopy was recorded 75 per cent ferigation with schedule-2 (T5) and 100 per cent fertigation (T6) treatments during the later stages of crop growth compared to the 100 per cent soil application (T1). The total and hermaphrodite flower number was highest in T5 (128.0 and 222.0 respectively) as compared to the 100 per cent soil application (84 and 162 respectively). Similarly, the number of fruits was also highest in T5 (67.25). The highest average fruit weight (288.50 g) and size was observed in 100 per cent fertigation (T6). The highest fruit yield of 18.49 kg plant-1 and 9.12 t ha-1 was observed in T5 (25% SA + 75% F) that was on par with T6 (100% F) recording 16.89 kg plant-1 and 8.31 t ha-1. Lowest yield was observed in T1 (100% SA) recording 11.36 kg plant-1 and 5.60 t ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant height was highest under T5 and T6 relative to T1 in later growth.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
75 per cent ferigation with schedule-2 (T5) and 100 per cent fertigation (T6)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
later stages of crop growthe0
Comparator
100 per cent soil application (T1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height and canopy was recorded 75 per cent ferigation with schedule-2 (T5) and 100 per cent fertigation (T6) treatments during the later stages of crop growth compared to the 100 per cent soil application (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

canopy was highest under T5 and T6 relative to T1 in later growth.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
75 per cent ferigation with schedule-2 (T5) and 100 per cent fertigation (T6)e0
Outcome
canopye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
later stages of crop growthe0
Comparator
100 per cent soil application (T1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height and canopy was recorded 75 per cent ferigation with schedule-2 (T5) and 100 per cent fertigation (T6) treatments during the later stages of crop growth compared to the 100 per cent soil application (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total flower number was highest in T5.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
flower numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
128.0e0
Comparator
100 per cent soil applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total and hermaphrodite flower number was highest in T5 (128.0 and 222.0 respectively) as compared to the 100 per cent soil application (84 and 162 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

hermaphrodite flower number was highest in T5.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
hermaphrodite flower numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
222.0e0
Comparator
100 per cent soil applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total and hermaphrodite flower number was highest in T5 (128.0 and 222.0 respectively) as compared to the 100 per cent soil application (84 and 162 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number was highest in T5 at 67.25.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
67.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of fruits was also highest in T5 (67.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fruit weight was highest with T6 at 288.50 g.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100 per cent fertigation (T6)e0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
288.50 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest average fruit weight (288.50 g) and size was observed in 100 per cent fertigation (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit size was highest with T6.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100 per cent fertigation (T6)e0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest average fruit weight (288.50 g) and size was observed in 100 per cent fertigation (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 had the highest fruit yield, on par with T6.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T5 (25% SA + 75% F)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.49 kg plant-1e0
Comparator
T6 (100% F)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit yield of 18.49 kg plant-1 and 9.12 t ha-1 was observed in T5 (25% SA + 75% F) that was on par with T6 (100% F) recording 16.89 kg plant-1 and 8.31 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 had the highest fruit yield, on par with T6.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T5 (25% SA + 75% F)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.12 t ha-1e0
Comparator
T6 (100% F)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit yield of 18.49 kg plant-1 and 9.12 t ha-1 was observed in T5 (25% SA + 75% F) that was on par with T6 (100% F) recording 16.89 kg plant-1 and 8.31 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had the lowest yield.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T1 (100% SA)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
11.36 kg plant-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lowest yield was observed in T1 (100% SA) recording 11.36 kg plant-1 and 5.60 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had the lowest yield.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
T1 (100% SA)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
5.60 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lowest yield was observed in T1 (100% SA) recording 11.36 kg plant-1 and 5.60 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.