Paper · 2020 · BALTIC FORESTRY

Drought-induced changes in antioxidant system and osmolyte content of poplar cuttings

Ružica Ždero Pavlović; Bojana Blagojević; Dragana Latković; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Poplars are widely utilized in the intensive and biomass production, as well as in breeding and environment protection programs. This experiment was performed to investigate the effect of drought stress on poplar clones (M-1, PE19/66 and B-229). Poplar clones were grown hydroponically under controlled conditions and exposed to drought stress by applying polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. The plant samples were collected and separated into roots and leaves. For estimation of antioxidant status, activities of different antioxidant enzymes were determined (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)), as well as antiradical power (ARP) against hydroxyl (˙OH) radical using ESR spin-trapping. The water stress parameters proline (PRO) content, activity of proline dehydrogenase (PDH) and glycine betaine (GB) content were determined. Drought stress had significant effects on PRO and GB contents, SOD, APX and CAT activities when compared to control. All investigated extracts were determined as good inhibitors for ˙OH radical reduction, especially clone M-1where there was an increase of ARP against ˙OH radical in drought condition what could help to prevent or meliorate oxidative damage. Results indicated that the M-1 clone had a greater accumulation of substances for osmotic adjustment and a more efficient enzymatic detoxification cycle for eliminating the negative effects caused by ROS under drought stress than clones B-229 and PE19/66. This study provides valuable information for understanding drought - responsive mechanisms in leaves and roots of poplar clones M-1, B-229 and PE19/66. Key words: antioxidant enzymes, climate change, drought, glycine betaine, proline.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly affected proline and glycine betaine contents in poplar compared with control.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
PRO and GB contentse1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress had significant effects on PRO and GB contents, SOD, APX and CAT activities when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly affected SOD, APX and CAT activities in poplar compared with control.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
SOD, APX and CAT activitiese1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress had significant effects on PRO and GB contents, SOD, APX and CAT activities when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone M-1 showed an increase of ARP against hydroxyl radical under drought condition.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Material
M-1e2
Treatment
drought conditione4
Outcome
ARPe2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“especially clone M-1where there was an increase of ARP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1209 · show in text ↑
e4

“in drought condition what could help to prevent or meliorate oxidative damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone M-1 had a greater accumulation of osmotic adjustment substances under drought than clones B-229 and PE19/66.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Material
M-1 clonee3
Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
accumulation of substances for osmotic adjustmente3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
clones B-229 and PE19/66e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results indicated that the M-1 clone had a greater accumulation of substances for osmotic adjustment and a more efficient enzymatic detoxification cycle for eliminating the negative effects caused by ROS under drought stress than clones B-229 and PE19/66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone M-1 had a more efficient enzymatic detoxification cycle under drought than clones B-229 and PE19/66.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Material
M-1 clonee3
Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
enzymatic detoxification cyclee3
Direction
more efficiente3
Comparator
clones B-229 and PE19/66e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results indicated that the M-1 clone had a greater accumulation of substances for osmotic adjustment and a more efficient enzymatic detoxification cycle for eliminating the negative effects caused by ROS under drought stress than clones B-229 and PE19/66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1563 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All investigated poplar extracts were good inhibitors of hydroxyl radical reduction.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
radical reductione5
Qualifier
good inhibitorse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“All investigated extracts were determined as good inhibitors for ˙OH radical reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1153 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.