Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Studies on the impact of soil application of biofertilizers on growth and yield of Kinnow mandarin

Vijay; G.S. Rana; Rps Dalal; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to see the effect of soil application of biofertilizers on growth and yield of Kinnow mandarin on 10 year old plants. Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27, Azotobacter chroococcum HT 54 and Pseudomonas P36 were used alone and in combination at two RDF (recommended dose of fertilizers) levels i.e. 75% and 100%. Maximum plant height, spread, flowers per twig, initial fruit set, number of fruits and yield were obtained with soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDF, however, average fruit weight was not significantly affected. The treatment significantly reduced fruit drop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 plus Pseudomonas P36 with 100% RDF gave maximum plant height, spread and flowers per twig.

Taxon
Kinnow mandarint0
Treatment
soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDFe0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27Azotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas P36e0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, spread, flowers per twige0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum plant height, spread, flowers per twig, initial fruit set, number of fruits and yield were obtained with soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kinnow mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination with 100% RDF gave maximum initial fruit set, fruit number and yield.

Taxon
Kinnow mandarint0
Treatment
soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDFe0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27Azotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas P36e0symbiont
Outcome
initial fruit set, number of fruits and yielde0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum plant height, spread, flowers per twig, initial fruit set, number of fruits and yield were obtained with soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kinnow mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fruit weight was not significantly affected by the biofertilizer treatment.

Taxon
Kinnow mandarint0
Treatment
soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDFe1
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27Azotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas P36e1symbiont
Outcome
average fruit weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“average fruit weight was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–599 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kinnow mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The biofertilizer treatment significantly reduced fruit drop.

Taxon
Kinnow mandarint0
Treatment
soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDFe1
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27Azotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas P36e1symbiont
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment significantly reduced fruit drop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Azotobacter chroococcum Mac 27 + Pseudomonas P36 applied with 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kinnow mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · growth · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter chroococcum · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · growth · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.