Paper · 2020 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Phosphorus Fertilizer Rating and Rhizobia Inoculation for Improved Productivity of Cowpea in Northern Uganda

S. M. Nyamaizi; J. B. Tumuhairwe; R. Amayo; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) is an important legume crop in the tropics and subtropical regions of the world. It is mainly grown for its leaves and grains, and to a lesser extent as a fodder crop. Cowpea is considered as the most important food grain legume in the dry savannas of tropical Africa. This study compared the yield of local (Agondire) and improved (SECOW 2W) cowpea varieties grown on an Oxisol. Inorganic P at levels of 0, 10, 20, and 40 kg·ha-1 was tested on each variety with or without rhizobia inoculation. The experiments were set up in a randomized complete block design and replicated thrice during the short and long rains of the 2015/2016 seasons on fifteen fields in Arua district, northern Uganda. Agondire responded significantly (P -1) were applied. A significant increase of 26.4% and 28.4% in grain yield of Agondire and SECOW 2W, respectively was obtained after inoculation with rhizobia. We concluded that inoculation and P fertilizer application increased the yield of both varieties, but with inoculation, SECOW 2W performs much better at lower P fertilizer rates than Agondire. Therefore, we recommend growing of SECOW 2W under inoculation with 20 kg P ha-1 and an application of 40 kg P ha-1 for Agondire local cowpea variety in northern Uganda.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia inoculation increased Agondire grain yield by 26.4%.

Material
Agondiree0
Treatment
inoculation with rhizobiae0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase of 26.4% and 28.4% in grain yield of Agondire and SECOW 2W, respectively was obtained after inoculation with rhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phosphorus Fertilizer Rating and Rhizobia Inoculation for Improved Productivity of Cowpea in Northern Uganda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia inoculation increased SECOW 2W grain yield by 28.4%.

Material
SECOW 2We0
Treatment
inoculation with rhizobiae0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase of 26.4% and 28.4% in grain yield of Agondire and SECOW 2W, respectively was obtained after inoculation with rhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phosphorus Fertilizer Rating and Rhizobia Inoculation for Improved Productivity of Cowpea in Northern Uganda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer increased yield of both cowpea varieties.

Treatment
inoculation and P fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation and P fertilizer application increased the yield of both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phosphorus Fertilizer Rating and Rhizobia Inoculation for Improved Productivity of Cowpea in Northern Uganda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With inoculation, SECOW 2W performed better at lower phosphorus rates than Agondire.

Material
SECOW 2We0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
performs much bettere0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
Agondiree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with inoculation, SECOW 2W performs much better at lower P fertilizer rates than Agondire.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phosphorus Fertilizer Rating and Rhizobia Inoculation for Improved Productivity of Cowpea in Northern Uganda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend inoculated SECOW 2W with 20 kg P ha-1 in northern Uganda.

Material
SECOW 2We0
Outcome
growing of SECOW 2W under inoculation with 20 kg P ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we recommend growing of SECOW 2W under inoculation with 20 kg P ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phosphorus Fertilizer Rating and Rhizobia Inoculation for Improved Productivity of Cowpea in Northern Uganda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 40 kg P ha-1 for Agondire in northern Uganda.

Material
Agondiree0
Outcome
application of 40 kg P ha-1e0
Setting
northern Ugandae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an application of 40 kg P ha-1 for Agondire local cowpea variety in northern Uganda.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1278 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.