Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Response of Summer Cowpea to Growth, Yield and Water Use Efficiency under different Irrigation and Nutrient Management in Lower Indo-Gangetic Plains

Anirban Bhowmik; Subam Khawas; Gopal Dutta; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2018 at the Instructional Farm, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Jaguli, Nadia to study the effects of three irrigation regimes (CPE 60 mm, CPE 50 mm and CPE 40 mm) and five nutrition (control, FYM @ 2.5 t/ha, cowdung @ 10 t/ha, poultry manure @ 2.0 t/ha and RDF) on summer cowpea. The results showed that under plenty water supply condition, scheduling of irrigation at CPE 40 accompanied with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (12.5:25:12.5 kg/ha of N, P and K, respectively) as basal was found to be the best treatment combination for obtaining maximum growth, yield components, pod and seed yield and moderate crop water use efficiency. Under limited or water constraint, deficit irrigation schedule at CPE 50 or CPE 60 in association with 100% RDF was the alternative option for achieving relatively higher pod and seed yield and higher to maximum crop water use efficiency. The seasonal yield response factor for cowpea was found to be 4.64.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPE 40 with recommended fertilizer gave maximum growth and yield under plentiful water.

Taxon
Summer CowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
scheduling of irrigation at CPE 40 accompanied with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (12.5:25:12.5 kg/ha of N, P and K, respectively) as basale0
Outcome
maximum growth, yield components, pod and seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under plenty water supply condition, scheduling of irrigation at CPE 40 accompanied with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (12.5:25:12.5 kg/ha of N, P and K, respectively) as basal was found to be the best treatment combination for obtaining maximum growth, yield components, pod and seed yield and moderate crop water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at CPE 50 or CPE 60 with RDF was recommended under limited water.

Taxon
Summer CowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
deficit irrigation schedule at CPE 50 or CPE 60 in association with 100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under limited or water constraint, deficit irrigation schedule at CPE 50 or CPE 60 in association with 100% RDF was the alternative option for achieving relatively higher pod and seed yield and higher to maximum crop water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal yield response factor for cowpea was 4.64.

Outcome
seasonal yield response factore0
Value
4.64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seasonal yield response factor for cowpea was found to be 4.64.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–995 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

68 papers: 62 positive, 6 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.