Paper · 1978 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of short-term waterlogging on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

F. R. Minchin; R. J. Summerfield; A. R. J. Eaglesham; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary When cowpea plants were grown in large pots under simulated tropical conditions, and were dependent on either symbiotic fixation or inorganic N for their total nitrogen requirements, short periods of waterlogging had adverse effects on vegetative growth and seed production. The effects of waterlogging were more acute as plants experienced stress at progressively earlier stages of development. In plants depending either on biologically fixed N or inorganic N, waterlogging before flowering reduced vegetative growth by about 50%. Although some compensation in vegetative growth occurred during the reproductive development of nodulated plants, seed yields in both cases were still 48% less than in unstressed plants. Depending on the stage of plant development, treatment effects were mediated largely through changes in branch, peduncle and flower production and/or abortion, which contributed directly to variations in the number of pods retained to maturity. Inorganic nitrogen stimulated vegetative growth but did not significantly improve seed yield compared with effectively nodulated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short periods of waterlogging adversely affected cowpea vegetative growth under simulated tropical conditions.

Treatment
short periods of waterlogginge0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“short periods of waterlogging had adverse effects on vegetative growth and seed production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short periods of waterlogging adversely affected cowpea seed production under simulated tropical conditions.

Treatment
short periods of waterlogginge0
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“short periods of waterlogging had adverse effects on vegetative growth and seed production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging effects on cowpea were more acute when stress occurred earlier in development.

Organ / stage
earlier stages of developmente0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
effects of waterlogginge0
Direction
more acutee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of waterlogging were more acute as plants experienced stress at progressively earlier stages of development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging before flowering reduced cowpea vegetative growth by about 50% in plants dependent on either fixed or inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
waterlogging before floweringe0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 50%e0
Qualifier
either on biologically fixed N or inorganic Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plants depending either on biologically fixed N or inorganic N, waterlogging before flowering reduced vegetative growth by about 50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulated cowpea plants showed some compensatory vegetative growth during reproductive development after waterlogging.

Organ / stage
reproductive developmente0
Outcome
compensation in vegetative growthe0
Qualifier
nodulated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some compensation in vegetative growth occurred during the reproductive development of nodulated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield after waterlogging was 48% lower than in unstressed cowpea plants under both nitrogen sources.

Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
less thane0
Value
48%e0
Qualifier
both casese0
Comparator
unstressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yields in both cases were still 48% less than in unstressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“short periods of waterlogging had adverse effects on vegetative growth and seed production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Depending on developmental stage, waterlogging altered cowpea branch, peduncle, and flower production or abortion, contributing to the number of pods retained at maturity.

Organ / stage
stage of plant developmente0
Outcome
number of pods retained to maturitye0
Qualifier
changes in branch, peduncle and flower production and/or abortione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on the stage of plant development, treatment effects were mediated largely through changes in branch, peduncle and flower production and/or abortion, which contributed directly to variations in the number of pods retained to maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic nitrogen stimulated cowpea vegetative growth compared with effectively nodulated plants.

Treatment
Inorganic nitrogene0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
effectively nodulated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inorganic nitrogen stimulated vegetative growth but did not significantly improve seed yield compared with effectively nodulated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic nitrogen did not significantly improve cowpea seed yield over effectively nodulated plants.

Treatment
Inorganic nitrogene0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
did not significantly improvee0
Comparator
effectively nodulated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inorganic nitrogen stimulated vegetative growth but did not significantly improve seed yield compared with effectively nodulated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–84 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

68 papers: 62 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

flooding · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

flooding · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 39 positive, 6 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.