Paper · 2020 · Soil Use and Management

Enhancing phosphorus availability, soil organic carbon, maize productivity and farm profitability through biochar and organic–inorganic fertilizers in an irrigated maize agroecosystem under semi‐arid climate

Muhammad Arif; Salman Ali; Muhammad Ilyas; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Biochar amendments offer promising potential to improve soil fertility, soil organic carbon (SOC) and crop yields; however, a limited research has explored these benefits of biochar in the arid and semi‐arid regions. This two‐year field study investigated the effects of Acacia tree biomass‐derived biochar, applied at 0 and 10 t ha ‒1 rates with farmyard manure (FYM) or poultry manure (PM) and mineral phosphorus (P) fertilizer combinations (100 kg P ha ‐1 ), on maize ( Zea mays L.) productivity, P use efficiency (PUE) and farm profitability. The application of biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizers significantly increased soil P and SOC contents than the sole organic or inorganic P fertilizers. Addition of biochar and PM as 100% P source resulted in the highest soil P (104% increase over control) and SOC contents (203% higher than control). However, maize productivity and PUE were significantly higher under balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochar and the increase was 110%, 94% and 170% than 100%‐FYM, 100%‐PM and 100% mineral fertilizer, respectively. Maize productivity and yield correlated significantly positively with soil P and SOC contents These positive effects were possibly due to the ability of biochar to improve soil properties, P availability from organic–inorganic fertilizers and SOC which resulted in higher PUE and maize productivity. Despite the significant positive relationship of PUE with net economic returns, biochar incorporation with PM and mineral fertilizer combination was economically profitable, whereas FYM along biochar was not profitable due to short duration of the field experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizers significantly increased soil P compared with sole organic or inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole organic or inorganic P fertilizerse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizers significantly increased soil P and SOC contents than the sole organic or inorganic P fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizers significantly increased SOC compared with sole fertilizer.

Treatment
biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizerse0
Outcome
SOC contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole organic or inorganic P fertilizerse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biochar with organic–inorganic P fertilizers significantly increased soil P and SOC contents than the sole organic or inorganic P fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and PM as the entire P source increased soil P by 104% over control.

Treatment
biochar and PM as 100% P sourcee0
Outcome
soil Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
104%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of biochar and PM as 100% P source resulted in the highest soil P (104% increase over control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and PM as the entire P source increased SOC by 203% over control.

Outcome
SOC contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
203%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“SOC contents (203% higher than control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced P fertilizer with biochar raised maize productivity by 110% compared with 100% FYM.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochare0
Outcome
maize productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
110%e0
Comparator
100%‐FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize productivity and PUE were significantly higher under balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochar and the increase was 110%, 94% and 170% than 100%‐FYM, 100%‐PM and 100% mineral fertilizer, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced P fertilizer with biochar raised maize productivity by 94% compared with 100% PM.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochare0
Outcome
maize productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
94%e0
Comparator
100%‐PMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize productivity and PUE were significantly higher under balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochar and the increase was 110%, 94% and 170% than 100%‐FYM, 100%‐PM and 100% mineral fertilizer, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced P fertilizer with biochar raised maize productivity by 170% compared with mineral fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochare0
Outcome
maize productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
170%e0
Comparator
100% mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize productivity and PUE were significantly higher under balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochar and the increase was 110%, 94% and 170% than 100%‐FYM, 100%‐PM and 100% mineral fertilizer, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced P fertilizer with biochar significantly increased PUE.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochare0
Outcome
PUEe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize productivity and PUE were significantly higher under balanced P fertilizer (50% organic + 50% mineral fertilizer) with biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1008 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize productivity and yield correlated positively with soil P and SOC.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
productivity and yielde0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
soil P and SOC contentse0

Not reportedCompoundSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize productivity and yield correlated significantly positively with soil P and SOC contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PUE had a significant positive relationship with net economic returns.

Outcome
net economic returnse0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
PUEe0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive relationship of PUE with net economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with PM and mineral fertilizer was economically profitable.

Treatment
biochar incorporation with PM and mineral fertilizer combinatione0
Outcome
economically profitablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“biochar incorporation with PM and mineral fertilizer combination was economically profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with biochar was not profitable.

Treatment
FYM along biochare0
Outcome
not profitablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“FYM along biochar was not profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1633 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 64 positive, 6 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

biochar · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 175 positive, 18 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

biochar · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.