Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of selected biostimulators and foliar fertilizers on plant development, plant yield, soil fertility and soil biochemical activity (dehydrogenases, phosphatases, catalases) during the cultivation of pea (Pisum sativum L.). A field experiment was conducted between 2016 and 2018 at the Gorzyń Experimental and Educational Station, Poznań University of Life Sciences in Poland. The following treatments were tested: (1) control; (2) Titanit; (3) Optysil; (4) Metalosate potassium; (5) Rooter; (6) Bolero Mo; (7) Adob Zn IDHA; (8) Adob B and (9) Adob 2.0 Mo. Adob Zn IDHA stimulated yields, especially under average moisture conditions and less so in drought conditions, and the differences compared to control amounted 8.36 and 4.3%, respectively. The results showed a close relationship between the effects of the biostimulators and foliar fertilizers and weather conditions during the study. It was not possible to determine whether any of the biostimulators or foliar fertilizers had a positive effect on pea seed yield in any year. Similarly, it was difficult to clearly determine the effect of the biostimulators and fertilizers on biochemical activity in the soil, although soil enzyme activity was influenced most by application of the Bolero Mo fertilizer. In all study years, biological nitrogen fixation was always greater after the application of a biostimulator/fertilizer treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Adob Zn IDHA increased pea yields by 8.36% under average moisture compared with control.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Adob Zn IDHAe0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
- Value
- 8.36e0
- Qualifier
- average moisture conditionse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adob Zn IDHA stimulated yields, especially under average moisture conditions and less so in drought conditions, and the differences compared to control amounted 8.36 and 4.3%, respectively.”
t0“Pisum sativum L. Plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Adob Zn IDHA increased pea yields by 4.3% under drought compared with control.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Adob Zn IDHAe0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
- Value
- 4.3%e0
- Qualifier
- drought conditionse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adob Zn IDHA stimulated yields, especially under average moisture conditions and less so in drought conditions, and the differences compared to control amounted 8.36 and 4.3%, respectively.”
t0“Pisum sativum L. Plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment effects varied closely with weather conditions.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- biostimulators and foliar fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- effects of the biostimulators and foliar fertilizerse0
- Qualifier
- weather conditions during the studye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed a close relationship between the effects of the biostimulators and foliar fertilizers and weather conditions during the study.”
t0“Pisum sativum L. Plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The study could not determine a consistently positive effect of the treatments on pea seed yield.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- positive effect on pea seed yield in any yeare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was not possible to determine whether any of the biostimulators or foliar fertilizers had a positive effect on pea seed yield in any year.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment effects on soil biochemical activity were unclear.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Outcome
- biochemical activity in the soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was difficult to clearly determine the effect of the biostimulators and fertilizers on biochemical activity in the soil”
t0“Pisum sativum L. Plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Bolero Mo had the greatest influence on soil enzyme activity.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Bolero Mo fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soil enzyme activitye0
- Direction
- influenced moste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil enzyme activity was influenced most by application of the Bolero Mo fertilizer.”
t0“Pisum sativum L. Plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulator or fertilizer treatment increased biological nitrogen fixation in every study year.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- biostimulator/fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- biological nitrogen fixatione0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- all study yearse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In all study years, biological nitrogen fixation was always greater after the application of a biostimulator/fertilizer treatment.”
t0“Pisum sativum L. Plants”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.