Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Zinc and copper interactions under variable soil phosphorus and moisture conditions in selected Saskatchewan soils

Noabur Rahman; Jeff Schoenau

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of phosphorus (P) fertilization (without and with added P fertilizer) and soil moisture (stress and no-stress) on efficacy, fate, and transformation of soil applied micronutrients such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and Cu + Zn in a wheat and pea cropping sequence. Wheat was grown as first crop under controlled environment conditions in which micronutrient fertilizer treatments were applied, whereas pea was grown as following crop with recommended macronutrient fertilizers to understand the residual effects of micronutrient fertilization. The high-P fertilizer application and no-stress moisture condition produced the highest grain and straw yield of wheat. Without P fertilization, there were significant negative effects of a combined application of Cu and Zn on wheat yield in a Dark Gray Chernozem. Yield of the following pea crop did not show response to residual Cu and Zn. Micronutrient fertilization increased the Cu and Zn concentration in wheat and pea grain and straw and resulted in increased after-harvest availability and supply in soils. Apart from the increased concentration in labile fraction, a considerable amount of added Cu and Zn was occluded with organic matter and oxyhydroxide species, respectively. Molecular speciation analyses revealed that carbonate associated was the dominant form of Cu and Zn in the soils. Additional Cu species such as Cu-acetate and methoxide, and Zn species including Zn-sorbed montmorillonite species were identified. Insoluble Cu-phosphate and Zn-phosphate complexes were not identified by speciation analyses and do not appear to be a significant factor controlling Cu and Zn availability in these soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High phosphorus and unstressed moisture gave the highest wheat grain and straw yields.

Treatment
high-P fertilizer application and no-stress moisture conditione0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high-P fertilizer application and no-stress moisture condition produced the highest grain and straw yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined copper and zinc application without phosphorus significantly reduced wheat yield in a Dark Gray Chernozem.

Treatment
combined application of Cu and Zne0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
negative effectse0
Qualifier
Without P fertilizatione0
Setting
Dark Gray Chernozeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without P fertilization, there were significant negative effects of a combined application of Cu and Zn on wheat yield in a Dark Gray Chernozem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Following pea yield did not respond to residual copper and zinc.

Treatment
residual Cu and Zne0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
did not show responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of the following pea crop did not show response to residual Cu and Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertilization increased copper and zinc concentration in wheat grain and straw.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe0
Treatment
Micronutrient fertilizatione0
Outcome
Cu and Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient fertilization increased the Cu and Zn concentration in wheat and pea grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertilization increased copper and zinc concentration in pea grain and straw.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe0
Treatment
Micronutrient fertilizatione0
Outcome
Cu and Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient fertilization increased the Cu and Zn concentration in wheat and pea grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertilization increased after-harvest soil copper and zinc availability and supply.

Treatment
Micronutrient fertilizatione0
Outcome
after-harvest availability and supply in soilse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient fertilization increased the Cu and Zn concentration in wheat and pea grain and straw and resulted in increased after-harvest availability and supply in soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1090 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added copper was substantially occluded with organic matter.

Outcome
added Cue0
Qualifier
organic mattere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a considerable amount of added Cu and Zn was occluded with organic matter and oxyhydroxide species, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc and copper interactions under variable soil phosphorus and moisture conditions in selected Saskatchewan soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added zinc was substantially occluded with oxyhydroxide species.

Outcome
added Cu and Zne0
Qualifier
oxyhydroxide speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a considerable amount of added Cu and Zn was occluded with organic matter and oxyhydroxide species, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1262 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonate-associated copper and zinc dominated soil speciation.

Outcome
dominant form of Cu and Zne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“carbonate associated was the dominant form of Cu and Zn in the soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1376 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper acetate and methoxide species were identified in the soils.

Outcome
Cu-acetate and methoxidee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Additional Cu species such as Cu-acetate and methoxide, and Zn species including Zn-sorbed montmorillonite species were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1509 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc-sorbed montmorillonite species were identified in the soils.

Outcome
Zn-sorbed montmorillonite speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Zn-sorbed montmorillonite species were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1508 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insoluble copper phosphate and zinc phosphate complexes were not identified and appeared unlikely to control availability.

Outcome
Insoluble Cu-phosphate and Zn-phosphate complexese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Insoluble Cu-phosphate and Zn-phosphate complexes were not identified by speciation analyses and do not appear to be a significant factor controlling Cu and Zn availability in these soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1698 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

zinc atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

copper atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

micronutrient · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.