Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies

Effect of S and Zn with N P K on yellow mustard (Brassica campestris L.): An economic analysis

Yogesh Upadhyay; Birendra Tigga; Soman Singh Dhruw; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out at Department of Soil Science, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad, India during rabi season. The experiment was laid out in 3×3 factorial randomized block design with 9 treatments in three replications. It indicates that application of sulphur and zinc increased the total cost of cultivation of yellow mustard markedly. The maximum total cost of cultivation (` 34610.68 ha−1) and the minimum net return (` 18159.72 ha−1) was computed with application of 30 kg S ha−1 and 5.5 kg Zn ha−1 while the maximum net return `−1 invested (1.89) was recorded with the application of 45 kg S ha−1 and 1.35 kg Zn ha−1. There should be a chance of better yield and net income, suggested all operations will be performing timely for this crop, because time is a very important factor and play great role for greater yield and its quality, before time or after time any operations in the field of agriculture production and quality will goes down. However, since these findings are based on one-year experiment and therefore, further research may be conducted to substantiate it under Allahabad agro climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur and zinc application markedly raised total cultivation cost.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
application of sulphur and zince0
Outcome
total cost of cultivatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yellow mustard (Brassica campestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of sulphur and zinc increased the total cost of cultivation of yellow mustard markedly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 kg S and 5.5 kg Zn treatment had the maximum cultivation cost of 34610.68 per hectare.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
application of 30 kg S ha−1 and 5.5 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
total cost of cultivatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
` 34610.68 ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yellow mustard (Brassica campestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum total cost of cultivation (` 34610.68 ha−1) and the minimum net return (` 18159.72 ha−1) was computed with application of 30 kg S ha−1 and 5.5 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 kg S and 5.5 kg Zn treatment had the minimum net return of 18159.72 per hectare.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
application of 30 kg S ha−1 and 5.5 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
minimume0
Value
` 18159.72 ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yellow mustard (Brassica campestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum total cost of cultivation (` 34610.68 ha−1) and the minimum net return (` 18159.72 ha−1) was computed with application of 30 kg S ha−1 and 5.5 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45 kg S and 1.35 kg Zn treatment gave the maximum net return per unit invested, 1.89.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
application of 45 kg S ha−1 and 1.35 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
net return `−1 investede0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.89e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yellow mustard (Brassica campestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum net return `−1 invested (1.89) was recorded with the application of 45 kg S ha−1 and 1.35 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–684 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest timely crop operations for better yield and income.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albat0
Outcome
all operations will be performing timely for this crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yellow mustard (Brassica campestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“There should be a chance of better yield and net income, suggested all operations will be performing timely for this crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–807 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.