Paper · 2008 · Food Engineering Progress

Storage Characteristics of Rice by Paper Packaging Materials

Chung-Su Han; Tae-Hwan Kang; He Li; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate storage characteristics of rice by paper and vinyl coated packaging materials.Weight, moisture contents, and broken ratio of white ce were also measured along with the packaging materials and storage period.The moisture content of the paper package decrease relatively higher than the vinyl-coated package under storage methods.Open and closed paper package reduce the weight of 1.77 and 1.76%, respectively, and weight loss of 0.20 and 0.5 1 % were observed for open d closed vinyl-coated package, respectively for indoor storage.During the storage, the rice moisture contents of paper package storage from 4.5 to 1.8 times more than vinyl-coated package storage.Paper package storage lost relatively high moisture contents because of good air circulation.Rice moisture contents when stored in closed viny l-coated and paper package storage dropped less than 0.3%, and up to 1.4%, respectively.The Broken ratio and whiteness had insignificant difference when compare to storage methods and period

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice in paper packaging lost more moisture than rice in vinyl-coated packaging.

Treatment
paper packagee0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
decrease relatively highere0
Comparator
vinyl-coated packagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The moisture content of the paper package decrease relatively higher than the vinyl-coated package under storage methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open paper packaging reduced stored rice weight by 1.77%.

Treatment
Opene0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
reducee0
Value
1.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Open and closed paper package reduce the weight of 1.77 and 1.76%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closed paper packaging reduced stored rice weight by 1.76%.

Treatment
closed paper packagee0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
reducee0
Value
1.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Open and closed paper package reduce the weight of 1.77 and 1.76%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open vinyl-coated packaging led to 0.20% stored rice weight loss.

Treatment
open d closed vinyl-coated packagee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
0.20e0
Setting
indoor storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight loss of 0.20 and 0.5 1 % were observed for open d closed vinyl-coated package, respectively for indoor storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closed vinyl-coated packaging led to 0.5 1 % stored rice weight loss.

Treatment
closed vinyl-coated packagee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
0.5 1 %e0
Setting
indoor storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight loss of 0.20 and 0.5 1 % were observed for open d closed vinyl-coated package, respectively for indoor storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice moisture loss in paper packaging was 4.5 to 1.8 times that in vinyl-coated packaging.

Treatment
paper package storagee0
Outcome
rice moisture contentse0
Direction
moree0
Value
4.5 to 1.8 timese0
Comparator
vinyl-coated package storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice moisture contents of paper package storage from 4.5 to 1.8 times more than vinyl-coated package storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closed vinyl-coated packaging kept rice moisture decline below 0.3%.

Treatment
closed viny l-coatede0
Outcome
moisture contentse0
Direction
droppede0
Value
less than 0.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice moisture contents when stored in closed viny l-coated and paper package storage dropped less than 0.3%, and up to 1.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paper packaging produced rice moisture decline up to 1.4%.

Treatment
paper package storagee0
Outcome
moisture contentse0
Direction
droppede0
Value
up to 1.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice moisture contents when stored in closed viny l-coated and paper package storage dropped less than 0.3%, and up to 1.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice broken ratio and whiteness did not differ significantly by storage method or period.

Treatment
storage methods and periode0
Outcome
Broken ratio and whitenesse0
Direction
insignificant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Broken ratio and whiteness had insignificant difference when compare to storage methods and period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑

storage · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

storage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 32 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.