Paper · 1969 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Studies of the Emergence of Rice Seedlings Seeded in Autumn and Winter : III. On the varietal difference in the rate of sprouting and the effect of fungicide coating of seeds

Masami HIMEDA

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present paper dealt with the comparison of several varieties in the rate of sprouting seeds and the effect of fungicide coating on seed surface for preventing the seed rot, 1. The samples of 14 varienties were tested in November and February seedings and the respective rates of sprouting seeds were 36∼9% and 79∼43% on cropless fields, 21∼3% and 56∼26% between rows of barley and 19∼2% and 54∼18% between rows of wheat. Varietal difference showed the same tendency in each time of seeding and each field condition. 2. Negative correlation was shown between the rate of sprouting seeds and the germination speed, therefore the difference of dormancy in varieties is said to be related to the rate of sprouting seeds. 3. Coating of seeds with the fungicide showed the high effect on prevention of the seed rot, while it gave some injuries on roots of young seedlings. Accordingly, a proper dose of the fungicide for coating is required. 4. The rate of sprouting seeds in November seeding was raised with the combination selected varieties and the fungicide coating.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cropless fields, November and February rice seedings had sprouting ranges of 36∼9% and 79∼43%, respectively.

Outcome
rates of sprouting seedse0
Value
36∼9% and 79∼43%e0
Qualifier
November and February seedingse1
Setting
cropless fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the respective rates of sprouting seeds were 36∼9% and 79∼43% on cropless fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–339 · show in text ↑
e1

“November and February seedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Between barley rows, November and February rice seedings had sprouting ranges of 21∼3% and 56∼26%, respectively.

Outcome
rates of sprouting seedse1
Value
21∼3% and 56∼26%e0
Qualifier
November and February seedingse2
Setting
between rows of barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“21∼3% and 56∼26% between rows of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–380 · show in text ↑
e1

“rates of sprouting seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–298 · show in text ↑
e2

“November and February seedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Between wheat rows, November and February rice seedings had sprouting ranges of 19∼2% and 54∼18%, respectively.

Outcome
rates of sprouting seedse1
Value
19∼2% and 54∼18%e0
Qualifier
November and February seedingse2
Setting
between rows of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“19∼2% and 54∼18% between rows of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“rates of sprouting seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–298 · show in text ↑
e2

“November and February seedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varietal ranking in sprouting rate had the same tendency across seeding times and field conditions.

Outcome
Varietal differencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varietal difference showed the same tendency in each time of seeding and each field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice seed sprouting rate was negatively correlated with germination speed.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Outcome
rate of sprouting seedse0
Direction
Negative correlatione0
Qualifier
germination speede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Negative correlation was shown between the rate of sprouting seeds and the germination speed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors related varietal dormancy differences to sprouting rates.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
rate of sprouting seedse0
Qualifier
difference of dormancye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the difference of dormancy in varieties is said to be related to the rate of sprouting seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed coating strongly prevented rice seed rot.

Treatment
Coating of seeds with the fungicidee0
Outcome
seed rote0
Direction
preventione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coating of seeds with the fungicide showed the high effect on prevention of the seed rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed coating injured roots of young rice seedlings.

Organ / stage
roots of young seedlingse0
Treatment
Coating of seeds with the fungicidee1
Outcome
injuries on roots of young seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it gave some injuries on roots of young seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“Coating of seeds with the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a proper fungicide coating dose because of root injury.

Outcome
a proper dose of the fungicide for coating is requirede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a proper dose of the fungicide for coating is required”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining selected rice varieties with fungicide coating raised November sprouting rates.

Treatment
combination selected varieties and the fungicide coatinge0
Outcome
rate of sprouting seedse0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
November seedinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of sprouting seeds in November seeding was raised with the combination selected varieties and the fungicide coating.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–42 · show in text ↑

storage · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fungicide · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fungicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.