Paper · 2020 · Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo agrarnogo unìversitetu Serìâ Bìologiâ

Stress-protective effect of putrescine and spermine on wheat plants during soil drought

O. I. Kokorev; M. A. Shkliarevskyi

20
claims
46
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Polyamines are considered multifunctional stress metabolites in plants. The ability of exogenous polyamines to increase plant resistance to adverse factors of various nature is well-known. At the same time, the stress-protective effects of polyamines at the level of whole plants under conditions of dehydration close to natural have not been sufficiently studied. The aim of this work was to study the effect of foliar treatment of wheat plants with solutions of putrescine and spermine on the functioning of their protective systems during drought under laboratory soil culture conditions. In the experiments, we used young wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.), which were subjected to a 4-day drought with a gradual decrease in the water content in the soil to 25% of the total moisture capacity. Spraying plants with putrescine in a concentration range of 0,25-5 mM significantly reduced the growth-inhibiting effect of drought; the effect of spermine was less effective, but also significant at P ≤ 0,05. Putrescine significantly reduced the manifestation of water deficit caused by drought. Under the action of spermine, only a tendency towards a decrease in the water deficit of the leaves was noted. Drought caused the effect of oxidative stress, which was manifested in an increase in the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in leaves. During the pretreatment of plants with spermine, the increase in the MDA content was partially leveled, and under the action of putrescine it was leveled almost completely. Treatment of plants with both polyamines at concentrations of 1 and 5 mM promoted preservation of the pool of chlorophylls and carotenoids in leaves under stress conditions. Moreover, when plants were treated with putrescine and spermine under drought conditions, a close to usual ratio of chlorophylls a/b was maintained. The proline content in leaves increased significantly under the influence of drought. Pretreatment with 1 and 5 mM putrescine, and 5 mM spermine reduced effect of proline content growth in leaves, caused by drought. At the same time, the treatment of plants with both polyamines caused the accumulation of sugars in the leaves. Under the influence of drought, the content of anthocyanins and flavonoids absorbing in the UV-B region significantly decreased in the leaves. Pretreatment with spermine somewhat mitigated the negative effect of drought on the anthocyanin content. Under the action of both putrescine and spermine, the content of flavonoids absorbing in UV-B stabilized in leaves. It was concluded that the protective effect of polyamines on wheat plants under drought conditions is primarily due to the regulation of water metabolism and the prevention of oxidative damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine significantly reduced drought inhibition of wheat growth.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
putrescine in a concentration range of 0,25-5 mMe0
Outcome
growth-inhibiting effect of droughte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying plants with putrescine in a concentration range of 0,25-5 mM significantly reduced the growth-inhibiting effect of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine significantly reduced drought inhibition of wheat growth, less effectively than putrescine.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
sperminee0
Outcome
growth-inhibiting effect of droughte1
Direction
less effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of spermine was less effective, but also significant at P ≤ 0,05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth-inhibiting effect of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–930 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine significantly reduced drought-induced water deficit.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Putrescinee0
Outcome
water deficite0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Putrescine significantly reduced the manifestation of water deficit caused by drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine showed a tendency to reduce leaf water deficit.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
sperminee0
Outcome
water deficit of the leavese0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
only a tendencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the action of spermine, only a tendency towards a decrease in the water deficit of the leaves was noted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased leaf malondialdehyde content.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in leavese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused the effect of oxidative stress, which was manifested in an increase in the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine partly leveled the drought-induced increase in malondialdehyde.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
sperminee0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
partially levelede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the pretreatment of plants with spermine, the increase in the MDA content was partially leveled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1443 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine almost completely leveled the drought-induced increase in malondialdehyde.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
putrescinee0
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
levelede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the action of putrescine it was leveled almost completely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in the MDA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1421 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine preserved chlorophyll and carotenoid pools under drought.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
putrescinee1
Outcome
pool of chlorophylls and carotenoids in leavese0
Direction
preservatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of plants with both polyamines at concentrations of 1 and 5 mM promoted preservation of the pool of chlorophylls and carotenoids in leaves under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1687 · show in text ↑
e1

“solutions of putrescine and spermine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine preserved chlorophyll and carotenoid pools under drought.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
sperminee1
Outcome
pool of chlorophylls and carotenoids in leavese0
Direction
preservatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of plants with both polyamines at concentrations of 1 and 5 mM promoted preservation of the pool of chlorophylls and carotenoids in leaves under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1687 · show in text ↑
e1

“solutions of putrescine and spermine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine maintained a near-usual chlorophyll a/b ratio during drought.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
putrescinee0
Outcome
ratio of chlorophylls a/be0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when plants were treated with putrescine and spermine under drought conditions, a close to usual ratio of chlorophylls a/b was maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1835 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine maintained a near-usual chlorophyll a/b ratio during drought.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
sperminee0
Outcome
ratio of chlorophylls a/be0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when plants were treated with putrescine and spermine under drought conditions, a close to usual ratio of chlorophylls a/b was maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1835 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased leaf proline content.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
proline content in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline content in leaves increased significantly under the influence of drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–1922 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine reduced drought-driven proline accumulation in leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
1 and 5 mM putrescinee0
Outcome
proline content growth in leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretreatment with 1 and 5 mM putrescine, and 5 mM spermine reduced effect of proline content growth in leaves, caused by drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2052 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine reduced drought-driven proline accumulation in leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
5 mM sperminee0
Outcome
proline content growth in leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretreatment with 1 and 5 mM putrescine, and 5 mM spermine reduced effect of proline content growth in leaves, caused by drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2052 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine caused sugar accumulation in leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
putrescinee1
Outcome
sugars in the leavese0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of plants with both polyamines caused the accumulation of sugars in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2163 · show in text ↑
e1

“solutions of putrescine and spermine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine caused sugar accumulation in leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
sperminee1
Outcome
sugars in the leavese0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of plants with both polyamines caused the accumulation of sugars in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2163 · show in text ↑
e1

“solutions of putrescine and spermine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased leaf anthocyanins and UV-B absorbing flavonoids.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
content of anthocyanins and flavonoids absorbing in the UV-B regione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the influence of drought, the content of anthocyanins and flavonoids absorbing in the UV-B region significantly decreased in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2165–2307 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine somewhat mitigated drought effects on anthocyanin content.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
sperminee0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretreatment with spermine somewhat mitigated the negative effect of drought on the anthocyanin content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2308–2412 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine stabilized UV-B absorbing flavonoids in leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
putrescinee0
Outcome
content of flavonoids absorbing in UV-Be0
Direction
stabilizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the action of both putrescine and spermine, the content of flavonoids absorbing in UV-B stabilized in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2413–2528 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine stabilized UV-B absorbing flavonoids in leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
sperminee0
Outcome
content of flavonoids absorbing in UV-Be0
Direction
stabilizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the action of both putrescine and spermine, the content of flavonoids absorbing in UV-B stabilized in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2413–2528 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–661 · show in text ↑

putrescine · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

putrescine · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

putrescine · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spermine · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

putrescine · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spermine · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

spermine · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

spermine · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.