Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Production

SOME FOLIAR APPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVING SNAP BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.) QUALITY AND YIELD AT FALL SEASON.

M. Shokr; El-S. Fathy

15
claims
39
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Understanding the impact of ambient environmental condition is a concern for agricultural production. This work was undertaken to study the responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco) to some stimulant substances, i.e., Cu- EDTA 8% Cu 1 ml/l; Mg-EDTA/Cit 10% Mg, 5ml/l and Fe-EDTA/Cit 10% Fe, 2ml/l in chelated forms, Ca-citrate 25% Ca, 2.5ml/l and KP/AA, 45/33.2 K2O, P2O5, 8.2% amino acids, 2.5ml/l; yeast extract, 25ml/l; seaweeds extracts, 5 ml/l and amino acids, 5ml/l as a foliar applications, throw two experiments conducted at El-Baramoon Res. Station, El-Dakahllia Governorate, Hort. Res. Inst. during the fall seasons of 2006 and 2007. Previous information showed that Bronco cv. display a physiological disorder at fall season (pale color of pods) which in turn negatively affects the economical value for the exportation of product, thereby, this work was suggested to improve yield and qualities, as well as growth and pigments of leaves and pods of snap bean plants, growing under abiotic stress conditions of fall season. Results indicated that Bronco cv. surpassed Giza3 in most vegetative growth parameters. Also, chlorophyll a and b of leaves, as well as pod chlorophyll a, b and TSS showed the same trends as vegetative growth aspects, though; Giza3 had the greatest concentrations of leaf and pod carotenoids in the two seasons. In addition, the highest number of pods/plant and consequently fresh pod yield were collected by Bronco plants. in the two seasons. On the other hand, the tallest, thickness and heaviest pod were gathered from Giza3 plants. The enhanced yield was associated with pod performance and number of pods/plant, regarding genotype responses under such condition. The applied treatments differed among them and were superior the control in all characteristics. The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively, these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively. It can be concluded that sprayed snap bean plants with the combination between Cu 0.5ml/l (Cu- EDTA 8% Cu), Mg 2.5ml/l (Mg-EDTA/Cit 10% Mg) and Fe 1.0ml/l (Fe-EDTA/Cit 10% Fe) and K 2.5ml/l (KPaa, 45/33.2 K2O, P2O5, 8.2% amino acids) for the best growth and maximum productivity under fall season conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronco surpassed Giza3 in most vegetative growth parameters of snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
Broncoe1
Outcome
vegetative growth parameterse1
Direction
surpassede1
Qualifier
in moste1
Comparator
Giza3e1

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bronco cv. surpassed Giza3 in most vegetative growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1135 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and b of leaves showed the same trends as vegetative growth aspects in snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b of leavese2
Direction
same trendse2

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll a and b of leaves, as well as pod chlorophyll a, b and TSS showed the same trends as vegetative growth aspects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1265 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza3 had the greatest leaf and pod carotenoid concentrations of snap bean in both seasons.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
Giza3e3
Outcome
leaf and pod carotenoidse3
Direction
greateste3

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e3

“Giza3 had the greatest concentrations of leaf and pod carotenoids in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronco had the highest number of pods per plant in snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
Broncoe4
Outcome
number of pods/plante4
Direction
higheste4

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest number of pods/plant and consequently fresh pod yield were collected by Bronco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1471 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza3 plants had the tallest plants and the thickest and heaviest pods of snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
Giza3e5
Outcome
tallest, thickness and heaviest pode5
Direction
talleste5

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e5

“the tallest, thickness and heaviest pod were gathered from Giza3 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied foliar treatments were superior to the control in all characteristics of snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
applied treatmentse6
Outcome
all characteristicse6
Direction
superiore6
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e6

“The applied treatments differed among them and were superior the control in all characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu + Mg + Fe combination increased snap bean yield by 24.8% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Cu + Mg + Fe combinatione1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
24.8e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KPaa increased snap bean yield by 18.4% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
KPaae1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
18.4e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg increased snap bean yield by 17.3% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Mge1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
17.3e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe increased snap bean yield by 16.8% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Fee1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
16.8e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yeast increased snap bean yield by 13.7% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
yeaste1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
13.7e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca increased snap bean yield by 13% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Cae1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
13e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu increased snap bean yield by 12.1% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Cue1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
12.1e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

seaweeds extract increased snap bean yield by 10.8% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
seaweeds extracte1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
10.8e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

amino acids increased snap bean yield by 8.8% over control (mean of two seasons).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
amino acidse1
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
8.8e7
Qualifier
mean of two seasonse7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

e0

“responses of two snap bean cultivars (Giza3 and Bronco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“these increased the yield over control by, 24.8, 18.4, 17.3, 16.8, 13.7, 13, 12.1, 10.8 and 8.8% (mean of two seasons) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best applications with the two bean cvs. in most cases were Cu + Mg + Fe combination, KPaa, Mg, Fe, yeast, Ca, Cu, seaweeds extract and at least amino acids respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1987 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

iron atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.