Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Studies on quality seeds with row-spacing at different levels of seed rate of wheat

Uday Pratap Singh; Ram Pyare; RN Maurya; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The treatments were evaluated in split plot design. Quality seeds, spacing and Seed rates significantly affected all the plant traits during experiment. In respect of growth parameters like initial plant population and plant height, yield attributes like length of ear and number of grains/ear and yield were recorded higher with breeder seed along with 22.5 cm row-spacing at 120 kg/ha levels of seed rate as compare to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed quality, spacing and seed rate significantly affected plant traits.

Treatment
Quality seeds, spacing and Seed ratese0
Outcome
all the plant traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Quality seeds, spacing and Seed rates significantly affected all the plant traits during experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeder seed at 22.5 cm rows and 120 kg/ha gave higher initial plant population and height.

Treatment
breeder seed along with 22.5 cm row-spacing at 120 kg/ha levels of seed ratee0
Outcome
initial plant population and plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“initial plant population and plant height, yield attributes like length of ear and number of grains/ear and yield were recorded higher with breeder seed along with 22.5 cm row-spacing at 120 kg/ha levels of seed rate as compare to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment increased ear length, grains per ear, and yield.

Treatment
breeder seed along with 22.5 cm row-spacing at 120 kg/ha levels of seed ratee0
Outcome
length of ear and number of grains/ear and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“length of ear and number of grains/ear and yield were recorded higher with breeder seed along with 22.5 cm row-spacing at 120 kg/ha levels of seed rate as compare to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–437 · show in text ↑

density · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.