Paper · 2002 · Crop Science

Seeding Rate and Genotype Effect on Agronomic Performance and End-Use Quality of Winter Wheat

B. Geleta; M. Atak; P. S. Baenziger; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
67
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Few experiments have studied how seeding rates affect agronomic performance and end-use quality of modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in the Great Plains. Higher grain yield and better quality grain production requires the use of appropriate seeding rates. During the 1997 and 1998 crop seasons, 20 winter wheat genotypes and experimental lines were evaluated at two locations (four environments) to assess seeding rate and genotype effects on agronomic performance and end-use quality of wheat. Significant differences among environments, seeding rates, and genotypes, and some of their interactions were identified. Lower seeding rates decreased plant population (by 62.3%), grain yield (by 0.8 Mg ha−1), kernel weight (by 1.3 mg kernel−1), flour yield (by 0.8 g/100 g grain), mixing time (by 0.7 min), caused later flowering (by 2 d), and increased flour protein content (by 15 mg g−1) and mixing tolerance (1 unit). Environment × genotype interactions were significant for all the traits except plant population and mixing tolerance. On the basis of the four environments, the seeding rate × genotype interactions were nonsignificant for all traits except plant height. These results provide evidence that agronomic performance and end-use quality traits are greatly influenced by the environmental conditions and less so by seeding rates. Seeding rate affected plant population, days to flowering, plant height, grain yield, kernel weight, flour yield, flour protein, and mixing time and tolerance of wheat; therefore, seeding rate should be considered as a factor in obtaining higher grain yields with good end-use quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environments, seeding rates, genotypes and some interactions differed significantly for assessed wheat traits.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Significant differences among environments, seeding rates, and genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences among environments, seeding rates, and genotypes, and some of their interactions were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates decreased wheat plant population by 62.3%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Lower seeding ratese0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
62.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower seeding rates decreased plant population (by 62.3%), grain yield (by 0.8 Mg ha−1), kernel weight (by 1.3 mg kernel−1), flour yield (by 0.8 g/100 g grain), mixing time (by 0.7 min)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates decreased wheat grain yield by 0.8 Mg ha−1.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Lower seeding ratese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.8 Mg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower seeding rates decreased plant population (by 62.3%), grain yield (by 0.8 Mg ha−1), kernel weight (by 1.3 mg kernel−1), flour yield (by 0.8 g/100 g grain), mixing time (by 0.7 min)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates decreased wheat kernel weight by 1.3 mg kernel−1.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Lower seeding ratese0
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1.3 mg kernel−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower seeding rates decreased plant population (by 62.3%), grain yield (by 0.8 Mg ha−1), kernel weight (by 1.3 mg kernel−1), flour yield (by 0.8 g/100 g grain), mixing time (by 0.7 min)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates decreased wheat flour yield by 0.8 g/100 g grain.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Lower seeding ratese0
Outcome
flour yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.8 g/100 g graine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower seeding rates decreased plant population (by 62.3%), grain yield (by 0.8 Mg ha−1), kernel weight (by 1.3 mg kernel−1), flour yield (by 0.8 g/100 g grain), mixing time (by 0.7 min)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates decreased wheat flour mixing time by 0.7 min.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Lower seeding ratese0
Outcome
mixing timee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.7 mine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower seeding rates decreased plant population (by 62.3%), grain yield (by 0.8 Mg ha−1), kernel weight (by 1.3 mg kernel−1), flour yield (by 0.8 g/100 g grain), mixing time (by 0.7 min)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates delayed wheat flowering by 2 d.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
latere0
Value
2 de0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused later flowering (by 2 d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates increased wheat flour protein by 15 mg g−1.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
flour protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15 mg g−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased flour protein content (by 15 mg g−1) and mixing tolerance (1 unit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower seeding rates increased wheat mixing tolerance by one unit.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
mixing tolerancee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1 unite0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased flour protein content (by 15 mg g−1) and mixing tolerance (1 unit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment by genotype interactions were significant for wheat traits other than plant population and mixing tolerance.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Environment × genotype interactionse0
Qualifier
except plant population and mixing tolerancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Environment × genotype interactions were significant for all the traits except plant population and mixing tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate by genotype interactions were nonsignificant for all wheat traits except plant height.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
seeding rate × genotype interactionse0
Qualifier
except plant heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seeding rate × genotype interactions were nonsignificant for all traits except plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering seeding rate to obtain higher wheat grain yield with good end-use quality.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
seeding rate should be considered as a factor in obtaining higher grain yields with good end-use qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seeding rate should be considered as a factor in obtaining higher grain yields with good end-use quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑

density · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.