Paper · 2020 · Journal of Cotton Research

Cotton N rate could be reduced further under the planting model of late sowing and high-density in the Yangtze River valley

Xinghu SONG; Ying HUANG; Yuan YUAN; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background An optimal N rate is one of the basic determinants for high cotton yield. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal N rate on a new cotton cropping pattern with late-sowing, high density and one-time fertilization at the first flower period in Yangtze River Valley, China. A 2-year experiment was conducted in 2015 and 2016 with a randomized complete block design. The cotton growth process, yield, and biomass accumulation were examined. Results The results showed that N rates had no effect on cotton growing progress or periods. Cotton yield was increased with N rates increasing from 120 to 180 kg·hm −2 , while the yield was not increased when the N rate was beyond 180 kg·hm −2 , or even decreased (9∼29%). Cotton had the highest biomass at the N rate of 180 kg·hm −2 is due to its highest accumulation speed during the fast accumulation period. Conclusions The result suggests that the N rate for cotton could be reduced further to be 180 kg·hm − 2 under the new cropping pattern in the Yangtze River Valley, China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates did not affect cotton growing progress or periods.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
cotton growing progress or periodse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N rates had no effect on cotton growing progress or periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield rose as nitrogen increased from 120 to 180 kg·hm −2.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
120 to 180 kg·hm −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield was increased with N rates increasing from 120 to 180 kg·hm −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beyond 180 kg·hm −2, nitrogen did not raise and sometimes decreased cotton yield by 9∼29%.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9∼29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield was not increased when the N rate was beyond 180 kg·hm −2 , or even decreased (9∼29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton had its highest biomass at 180 kg·hm −2 nitrogen.

Treatment
N rate of 180 kg·hm −2e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton had the highest biomass at the N rate of 180 kg·hm −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–806 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest biomass at 180 kg·hm −2 was attributed to the highest accumulation speed during fast accumulation.

Outcome
biomasse0
Qualifier
highest accumulation speed during the fast accumulation periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton had the highest biomass at the N rate of 180 kg·hm −2 is due to its highest accumulation speed during the fast accumulation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–883 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 180 kg·hm − 2 nitrogen for this cotton cropping pattern.

Outcome
N rate for cotton could be reduced further to be 180 kg·hm − 2e0
Value
180 kg·hm − 2e0
Setting
Yangtze River Valley, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N rate for cotton could be reduced further to be 180 kg·hm − 2 under the new cropping pattern in the Yangtze River Valley, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1054 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.