Abstract
In the field, two experiments were confirmed in 2017 in addition to 2018 seasons at Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farm, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt, toward investigate the influence of nitrogen levels (100, 110 and 120 kg N/fed) and spraying with humic-acid levels (without , 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 g/L) on growth, yield and its attributes, as well ear rot disease of maize under intercropping system of maize and soybean. The field trials were executed in three replicates using split-plot design. The main-plots were consigned to nitrogen levels. The sub-plots were deal out to four levels of humic-acid as foliar spraying. Growth, yield and its attributes of both maize and soybean under intercropping system were significantly improved by rising N-levels from 100 to 110 and 120 kg N/fed and the recommended one was 120 kg N/fed which led to decrease ear rot disease infection and severity. Spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) produced highest growth, yield and its attributes of both maize and soybean under intercropping system and caused more reduction in ear rot disease infection and severity. It can be recommended that the maximum growth, productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coefficient (RCC), total income (LE), i.e.10588.60 and 11032 LE, respectively, economic return (LE) and lowest ear rot disease infection and severity (in maize) under intercropping system of both soybean and maize were obtained from spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fed beneath the environmental circumstances of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Rising nitrogen from 100 to 110 and 120 kg N/fed significantly improved growth and yield of intercropped maize and soybean.
- Taxon
- maize and soybean
Glycine max
Zea mayse2 - Treatment
- rising N-levels from 100 to 110 and 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- Growth, yield and its attributese2
- Direction
- improvede2
- Comparator
- from 100e2
- Setting
- Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“at Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farm, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt”
e2“Growth, yield and its attributes of both maize and soybean under intercropping system were significantly improved by rising N-levels from 100 to 110 and 120 kg N/fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying with humic acid at 7.5 g/L produced the highest growth and yield of intercropped maize and soybean.
- Taxon
- maize and soybeanGlycine maxZea mayse2
- Treatment
- Spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L)e2
- Outcome
- growth, yield and its attributese2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Setting
- Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“at Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farm, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt”
e2“Spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) produced highest growth, yield and its attributes of both maize and soybean under intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
The recommended 120 kg N/fed led to a decrease in maize ear rot infection and severity.
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- ear rot disease infection and severitye2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Setting
- Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“at Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farm, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt”
e2“the recommended one was 120 kg N/fed which led to decrease ear rot disease infection and severity”
e3“ear rot disease of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying with humic acid at 7.5 g/L caused a greater reduction in maize ear rot infection and severity.
- Treatment
- Spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L)e2
- Outcome
- ear rot disease infection and severitye3
- Direction
- more reductione3
- Setting
- Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“at Sakha Agricultural Researches Station Farm, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt”
e2“Spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) produced highest growth, yield and its attributes of both maize and soybean under intercropping system”
e3“caused more reduction in ear rot disease infection and severity”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the maximum growth, productivity and land equivalent ratio of intercropped soybean and maize.
- Taxon
- soybean and maizeGlycine maxZea mayse3
- Treatment
- spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- maximum growth, productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER)e1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Setting
- Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“maximum growth, productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coefficient (RCC), total income (LE)”
e2“were obtained from spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fed”
e3“under intercropping system of both soybean and maize”
e4“beneath the environmental circumstances of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the maximum relative crowding coefficient of intercropped soybean and maize.
- Taxon
- soybean and maizeGlycine maxZea mayse3
- Treatment
- spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- relative crowding coefficient (RCC)e1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Setting
- Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“maximum growth, productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coefficient (RCC), total income (LE)”
e2“were obtained from spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fed”
e3“under intercropping system of both soybean and maize”
e4“beneath the environmental circumstances of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the maximum total income of 10588.60 and 11032 LE.
- Taxon
- soybean and maizeGlycine maxZea mayse3
- Treatment
- spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- total income (LE)e1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 10588.60 and 11032 LEe5
- Setting
- Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“maximum growth, productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coefficient (RCC), total income (LE)”
e5“i.e.10588.60 and 11032 LE, respectively”
e2“were obtained from spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fed”
e3“under intercropping system of both soybean and maize”
e4“beneath the environmental circumstances of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the highest economic return.
- Taxon
- soybean and maizeGlycine maxZea mayse3
- Treatment
- spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- economic return (LE)e1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Setting
- Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“economic return (LE)”
e2“were obtained from spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fed”
e3“under intercropping system of both soybean and maize”
e4“beneath the environmental circumstances of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the lowest ear rot infection and severity in maize.
- Treatment
- spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fede2
- Outcome
- ear rot disease infection and severitye1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Setting
- Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“lowest ear rot disease infection and severity (in maize)”
e2“were obtained from spraying with humic-acid (7.5 g/L) and fertilizing with 120 kg N/fed”
e4“beneath the environmental circumstances of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 120 kg N/fed as the nitrogen rate for intercropped maize and soybean.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“ear rot disease of maize”
e2“the recommended one was 120 kg N/fed”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fertilization · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
80 papers more in this group
See all 84 papers →other · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →other · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
83 papers more in this group
See all 87 papers →other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
249 papers more in this group
See all 253 papers →application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
400 papers more in this group
See all 404 papers →nitrogen · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
317 papers in the same direction as this paper · 91 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
412 papers more in this group
See all 416 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.