Abstract
Two experiments were conducted at two successive seasons 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 during the activity of the project "Grafting techniques to improve production and to solve the problems in melon" under plastic greenhouse by supporting the Agriculture Development Programme in Egypt. The first experiment was conducted to evaluate two melon cultivars i.e., Hybrid London (Galia type) and Hybrid Magd (Ananas type) and eight cucurbit rootstocks for their resistance and/or susceptibility to soil borne diseases such as (Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium albo-atrum) which considered the most serious pathogens that cause soil born diseases on melon crop. The data revealed that the Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstocks were resistant to the F. oxysporum and V. albo-atrum pathogens in infested and non-infested soil except Pakistani luffa rootstock which was susceptible to the two pathogens. Moreover Squash No3, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstocks are considered the highly resistant to F. oxysporum while Squash No3, FliexFort and Nun 6001 rootstocks are considered highly resistant to Verticillium albo-atrum. On the other hand the two tested melon varieties {Hybrid London and Hybrid Magd} were highly susceptible to the previous pathogens. The second experiment was conducted to compare between the effects of the previous resistant rootstocks and between three grafting methods (hole insertion grafting, splice grafting and tongue-approach grafting) on melonplant growth and yield components of Hybrid London compared with non-grafted plants which used as control. The highest success rate of grafted melon seedlings was recorded by tongue-approach grafting method followed by hole insertion grafting method. Moreover, the plants survival rate, vegetative growth characteristics (stem length, leaves number and shoot fresh weights), of grafting melon seedlings varied depending on grafting methods, rootstocks and the combination between grafting methods and rootstocks and difference between scion and rootstocks hypocotyls . The data revealed that the grafting onto Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 rootstocks are suitable method for commercial melons production under greenhouse conditions in Egypt by provides sufficient protection against Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium albo-atrum especially. This result due to the survival rate of plants grafted onto these rootstocks was extremely high. Moreover, the grafting melon seedlings by hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 gave vigour growth, higher yield under greenhouse conditions without exhibiting any detrimental effects on melon fruit quality of the Hybrid London cultivar.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Six cucurbit rootstocks were resistant to Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium albo-atrum in infested and non-infested soil.
- Taxon
- melon
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis melot0 - Material
- Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstockse1
- Interactor
- F. oxysporum
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium oxysporume1pathogen - Second interactor
- V. albo-atrum
Verticillium albo-atrume1pathogen - Outcome
- resistant to the F. oxysporum and V. albo-atrum pathogense1
- Setting
- infested and non-infested soile1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“The data revealed that the Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstocks were resistant to the F. oxysporum and V. albo-atrum pathogens in infested and non-infested soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The Pakistani luffa rootstock was susceptible to both Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium albo-atrum.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Material
- Pakistani luffa rootstocke2
- Interactor
- F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume1pathogen
- Second interactor
- V. albo-atrumVerticillium albo-atrume1pathogen
- Outcome
- susceptible to the two pathogense2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“The data revealed that the Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstocks were resistant to the F. oxysporum and V. albo-atrum pathogens in infested and non-infested soil”
e2“except Pakistani luffa rootstock which was susceptible to the two pathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
Squash No3, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 rootstocks were highly resistant to Fusarium oxysporum.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Material
- Squash No3, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstockse3
- Interactor
- F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume3pathogen
- Outcome
- highly resistante3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e3“Squash No3, Ferro RZ, and Nun 6001 rootstocks are considered the highly resistant to F. oxysporum”
Claim · model-written summary
Squash No3, FliexFort and Nun 6001 rootstocks were highly resistant to Verticillium albo-atrum.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Material
- Squash No3, FliexFort and Nun 6001 rootstockse4
- Interactor
- Verticillium albo-atrumVerticillium albo-atrume4pathogen
- Outcome
- highly resistante4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e4“Squash No3, FliexFort and Nun 6001 rootstocks are considered highly resistant to Verticillium albo-atrum”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid London and Hybrid Magd melon varieties were highly susceptible to the previous pathogens.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Material
- Hybrid London and Hybrid Magde5
- Interactor
- previous pathogense5pathogen
- Outcome
- highly susceptiblee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e5“the two tested melon varieties {Hybrid London and Hybrid Magd} were highly susceptible to the previous pathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
Tongue-approach grafting gave the highest success rate of grafted melon seedlings, followed by hole insertion grafting.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- tongue-approach grafting methode6
- Outcome
- success rate of grafted melon seedlingse6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Comparator
- hole insertion grafting methode6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e6“The highest success rate of grafted melon seedlings was recorded by tongue-approach grafting method followed by hole insertion grafting method”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant survival rate and vegetative growth of grafted melon seedlings varied with grafting method, rootstock and their combination.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- grafting methods, rootstockse7
- Outcome
- survival ratee7
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e7“the plants survival rate, vegetative growth characteristics (stem length, leaves number and shoot fresh weights), of grafting melon seedlings varied depending on grafting methods, rootstocks and the combination between grafting methods and rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting onto Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 rootstocks is a suitable method for commercial melon production under greenhouse conditions in Egypt.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Outcome
- suitable method for commercial melons productione1
- Setting
- greenhouse conditions in Egypte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“grafting onto Squash No3, Super Shintoza, Coplt, FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 rootstocks are suitable method for commercial melons production under greenhouse conditions in Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
Survival rate of melon plants grafted onto the resistant rootstocks was extremely high.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Outcome
- survival rate of plants grafted onto these rootstockse1
- Qualifier
- extremely highe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“This result due to the survival rate of plants grafted onto these rootstocks was extremely high”
Claim · model-written summary
Hole insertion and splice grafting onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 gave higher melon yield under greenhouse conditions.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“the grafting melon seedlings by hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 gave vigour growth, higher yield under greenhouse conditions without exhibiting any detrimental effects on melon fruit quality of the Hybrid London cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Hole insertion and splice grafting onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 increased melon vigour growth.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001e1
- Outcome
- vigour growthe1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“the grafting melon seedlings by hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 gave vigour growth, higher yield under greenhouse conditions without exhibiting any detrimental effects on melon fruit quality of the Hybrid London cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Hole insertion and splice grafting onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 had no detrimental effect on melon fruit quality of Hybrid London.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001e1
- Outcome
- melon fruit qualitye1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Qualifier
- without exhibiting any detrimental effectse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELON (CUCUMIS MELO)”
e1“the grafting melon seedlings by hole insertion and splice grafting methods onto FliexFort, Ferro RZ and Nun 6001 gave vigour growth, higher yield under greenhouse conditions without exhibiting any detrimental effects on melon fruit quality of the Hybrid London cultivar”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →grafting · quality: grain · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.