Paper · 2020 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

EFFECTS OF MIXED CONTROLLED RELEASE AND NORMAL UREA ON MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L) GROWTH, GRAIN YIELD AND NITROGEN BALANCE AND USE EFFICIENCY IN NORTHEAST CHINA

C.L. LI; Y.Q. CAO; Y. WANG; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mixed application of controlled release urea (CRU) and normal urea (NU) are effective N fertilization plural to improve crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). In this study, field experiments were conducted for two consecutive years in 2018 and 2019 on two contrasting soil types. The treatments included one solely NU and four mixture ratios of CRU and NU under an identical N rate of 180 kg N ha -1 as single basal fertilizer before sowing. The results showed that the highest maize yields were obtained from the CRU30% treatment, increasing by 24% on sandy soil and 11% on clay soil as compared to CRU0% treatment. The yield improvements were mainly attributed to increased seed setting percentage and grain numbers per ear. Maize plants grown in CRU30% treatment accumulated more dry biomass (DM) and N uptake after silking, and thereby increasing grain yield and NUE. This work demonstrates that the appropriate mixture of CRU and NU increases maize yield and NUE while reducing N loss, by optimizing N fertilizer release and soil N availability to match the crop N demand, and 30%CRU and 70%NU was determined as the optimal mixture ratio on both sandy and clay soils in Northeast China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU30% increased maize yield by 24% on sandy soil relative to CRU0%.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Treatment
CRU30% treatmente0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
CRU0% treatmente0
Setting
sandy soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest maize yields were obtained from the CRU30% treatment, increasing by 24% on sandy soil and 11% on clay soil as compared to CRU0% treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU30% increased maize yield by 11% on clay soil relative to CRU0%.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Treatment
CRU30% treatmente0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
CRU0% treatmente0
Setting
clay soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest maize yields were obtained from the CRU30% treatment, increasing by 24% on sandy soil and 11% on clay soil as compared to CRU0% treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield improvement was attributed to increased seed setting and grain number per ear.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Outcome
yield improvementse0
Qualifier
increased seed setting percentage and grain numbers per eare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield improvements were mainly attributed to increased seed setting percentage and grain numbers per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU30% plants accumulated more dry biomass after silking.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Organ / stage
after silkinge0
Treatment
CRU30% treatmente0
Outcome
dry biomass (DM)e0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants grown in CRU30% treatment accumulated more dry biomass (DM) and N uptake after silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU30% plants accumulated more nitrogen after silking.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Organ / stage
after silkinge0
Treatment
CRU30% treatmente0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants grown in CRU30% treatment accumulated more dry biomass (DM) and N uptake after silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed urea application increased nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Treatment
appropriate mixture of CRU and NUe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate mixture of CRU and NU increases maize yield and NUE while reducing N loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed urea application reduced nitrogen loss.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Treatment
appropriate mixture of CRU and NUe0
Outcome
N losse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate mixture of CRU and NU increases maize yield and NUE while reducing N loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors selected 30% CRU and 70% NU as the optimal mixture on sandy and clay soils in Northeast China.

Taxon
MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)Zea mayst0
Treatment
30%CRU and 70%NUe0
Outcome
optimal mixture ratioe0
Setting
Northeast Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30%CRU and 70%NU was determined as the optimal mixture ratio on both sandy and clay soils in Northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

190 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.