Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Changes of nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities and protein content in response to low light during the seed filling stage in rice.

Xu GuangLi; Jia Liu; Chenggang Liang; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Light condition is one of the important factors affecting plant growth. During plant growth, light deficiency will result in the decrease in carbon fixation, photosynthetic efficiency, and leaf senescence acceleration, and thus decrease yield evidently. Besides yield, light also affect the rice qualities through influencing the seed compositions such as protein. Many studies have been carried out to evaluate the effect of light on protein synthesis. For example, previous studies have been certified that the protein accumulation is increased during the seed filling stage, as well as amino acids. The enzymes of glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamic oxalo-acetic transaminase (GOT), and glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) are considered as the key enzymes regulating the synthesis of protein. Almost 95% of N was absorbed through GS/glutamate synthetase (GOGAT) cycle in plants and converted into glutamic acid (Glu) and glutamine (Gln). The Glu and Gln are then converted into other amino acids which provide the precursor materials for protein synthesis through the transamination reactions of GOT and GPT. However, researches about the effect of the activities of GS, GOT and GPT on amino acid and protein synthesis of rice are limited, especially under stress conditions such as low light.Based on previous studies, we carried out this experiment to evaluate the effect of low light on key enzyme activities of nitrogen metabolism and protein accumulation during the seed filling stage. The aims of this study were to study the dynamic changes of GS, GOT and GPT under different low light conditions during the seed filling stage, and evaluate the relationships between the activities of enzymes and protein accumulation.The experiment was initiated at Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, China, in 2013. Four cultivars including japonica cultivars Akitakomachi and Koshihikari, indica cultivar IR72, and hybrid indica cultivar Gangyou 527 were selected as the materials. All the cultivars were managed routinely till the flowering stage, then 25% shading (A1) and 50% shading (A2), were set respectively as the treatments till maturity by using shade net, and natural condition was set as CK. Each treatment plot was repeated 3 times and the rice panicles which grown uniformly were marked for further sample collection. After 10 days of treatments, the seed samples were collected per 7-day period till maturity and stored in freezer at -80 ℃. After harvest, the samples were used to measure GS, GOT and GPT activities, as well as soluble protein, total protein and amino acid contents.Results showed that the GS activities were significantly decreased by 20.01%-30.52% at A2 than A1 (11.61%-19.36%) compared with CK, whereas, the activities of GOT and GPT increased significantly at A2 (GOT increased by 26.07%-36.82% and GPT increased by 26.07%-61.07%) than A1 (GOT increased by 14.02%-23.02% GPT increased by 11.81%-33.83%) compared with CK. In consistent with GOT and GPT, patterns of soluble protein, total protein, as well as amino acids were also significantly increased under low light conditions especially at A2 (compared with CK, soluble protein increased by 31.19%-70.51%, total protein increased by 16.02% 28.89%, and amino acids increased by 16.04%-22.48% at A2). The correlation analysis showed that GS activity was negatively correlated to soluble protein, total protein and amino acids under low light conditions, however, GOT and GPT showed positive correlations with soluble protein, total protein and amino acids.Based on the results, we speculated that the synthesis of protein of rice grain was more significantly affected by GOT and GPT which tended to increase the accumulation of both protein and amino acids, compared with GS. In addition, in consistent with previous studies, the low light conditions were beneficial for protein and amino acid synthesis of rice grain during the seed filling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine synthetase activity decreased by 20.01%-30.52% under 50% shading (A2) compared with natural light.

Treatment
50% shading (A2)e1
Gene
GSe2
Outcome
GS activitiese2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
20.01%-30.52%e2
Comparator
CKe2

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“then 25% shading (A1) and 50% shading (A2), were set respectively as the treatments till maturity by using shade net, and natural condition was set as CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2206 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that the GS activities were significantly decreased by 20.01%-30.52% at A2 than A1 (11.61%-19.36%) compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GOT activity increased by 26.07%-36.82% under A2 compared with CK.

Treatment
A2e3
Gene
GOTe3
Outcome
activitiese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
26.07%-36.82%e3
Comparator
CKe3

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“then 25% shading (A1) and 50% shading (A2), were set respectively as the treatments till maturity by using shade net, and natural condition was set as CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2206 · show in text ↑
e3

“the activities of GOT and GPT increased significantly at A2 (GOT increased by 26.07%-36.82% and GPT increased by 26.07%-61.07%) than A1 (GOT increased by 14.02%-23.02% GPT increased by 11.81%-33.83%) compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2743–2959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GPT activity increased by 26.07%-61.07% under A2 compared with CK.

Treatment
A2e3
Gene
GPTe3
Outcome
activitiese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
26.07%-61.07%e3
Comparator
CKe3

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“the activities of GOT and GPT increased significantly at A2 (GOT increased by 26.07%-36.82% and GPT increased by 26.07%-61.07%) than A1 (GOT increased by 14.02%-23.02% GPT increased by 11.81%-33.83%) compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2743–2959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble protein increased by 31.19%-70.51% under A2 compared with CK.

Treatment
A2e4
Outcome
soluble proteine4
Direction
increasede4
Value
31.19%-70.51%e4
Comparator
CKe4

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared with CK, soluble protein increased by 31.19%-70.51%, total protein increased by 16.02% 28.89%, and amino acids increased by 16.04%-22.48% at A2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3139–3291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total protein increased by 16.02%-28.89% under A2 compared with CK.

Treatment
A2e4
Outcome
total proteine4
Direction
increasede4
Value
16.02% 28.89%e4
Comparator
CKe4

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared with CK, soluble protein increased by 31.19%-70.51%, total protein increased by 16.02% 28.89%, and amino acids increased by 16.04%-22.48% at A2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3139–3291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acids increased by 16.04%-22.48% under A2 compared with CK.

Treatment
A2e4
Outcome
amino acidse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
16.04%-22.48%e4
Comparator
CKe4

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared with CK, soluble protein increased by 31.19%-70.51%, total protein increased by 16.02% 28.89%, and amino acids increased by 16.04%-22.48% at A2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3139–3291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GS activity was negatively correlated with soluble protein, total protein and amino acids under low light.

Gene
GSe5
Outcome
soluble protein, total protein and amino acidse5
Direction
negatively correlatede5

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e5

“The correlation analysis showed that GS activity was negatively correlated to soluble protein, total protein and amino acids under low light conditions, however, GOT and GPT showed positive correlations with soluble protein, total protein and amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3294–3548 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GOT and GPT activities were positively correlated with soluble protein, total protein and amino acids.

Gene
GOT and GPTe5
Outcome
soluble protein, total protein and amino acidse5
Direction
positive correlationse5

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e5

“The correlation analysis showed that GS activity was negatively correlated to soluble protein, total protein and amino acids under low light conditions, however, GOT and GPT showed positive correlations with soluble protein, total protein and amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3294–3548 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

GOT and GPT more strongly affected protein and amino acid accumulation in rice grain than GS, the authors speculate.

Gene
GOT and GPTe6
Outcome
the accumulation of both protein and amino acidse6
Qualifier
compared with GSe6

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e6

“we speculated that the synthesis of protein of rice grain was more significantly affected by GOT and GPT which tended to increase the accumulation of both protein and amino acids, compared with GS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3571–3767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light was beneficial for protein and amino acid synthesis in rice grain during the seed filling stage.

Organ / stage
seed filling stagee7
Treatment
low light conditionse7
Outcome
protein and amino acid synthesise7
Direction
beneficiale7

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
e7

“the low light conditions were beneficial for protein and amino acid synthesis of rice grain during the seed filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3819–3940 · show in text ↑

light · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.