Paper · 2020 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Influence of Nutrient Mobilizers on Productivity and Nutrient Uptake in Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Crop under the Tarai Region of Uttarakhand

Girja S. Tewari; Navneet Pareek; Ramesh Chandra; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background: Pulses in Indian agriculture hold a vital position. They are considered as a rich source of vegetable protein, vitamins, minerals and calories to the entire vegetarians in India. Due to long and indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers, there is deterioration of soil health and hence decrease in productivity. Nutrient mobilizers such as Rhizobium, PGPRs are biological microorganisms that help in atmospheric N2 fixation along with phosphorous solubilization hence; increase the availability of nutrients to the plants. Methods: In this paper a field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 2017 and 2018 to evaluate the influence of nutrient mobilizers along with recommended dose of fertilizers on productivity and nutrient uptake in blackgram. Result: A pronounced effect of nutrient mobilizers was observed on the yield attributing characters of urdbean. Maximum number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, maximum nutrient content and uptake in grain and straw was observed in the treatment T11 (Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDF) followed by T10 (Rh + Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 14.0 kg/ha + RDF). It can be concluded that nutrient mobilizers not only increase the yield attributes in blackgram but also responsible for increase in nutrient content in the grains which ultimately signals positive attitude regarding nutritional security of the nation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T11 maximized seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight and grain yield in blackgram.

Taxon
Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDFe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight, grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Setting
Tarai Region of Uttarakhandt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of Nutrient Mobilizers on Productivity and Nutrient Uptake in Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Crop under the Tarai Region of Uttarakhand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, maximum nutrient content and uptake in grain and straw was observed in the treatment T11 (Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T11 maximized straw yield and harvest index in blackgram.

Taxon
Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDFe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
straw yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
Maximume0
Setting
Tarai Region of Uttarakhandt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of Nutrient Mobilizers on Productivity and Nutrient Uptake in Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Crop under the Tarai Region of Uttarakhand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, maximum nutrient content and uptake in grain and straw was observed in the treatment T11 (Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T11 maximized nutrient content and uptake in grain and straw of blackgram.

Taxon
Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDFe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient content and uptake in grain and strawe0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Tarai Region of Uttarakhandt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of Nutrient Mobilizers on Productivity and Nutrient Uptake in Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Crop under the Tarai Region of Uttarakhand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, maximum nutrient content and uptake in grain and straw was observed in the treatment T11 (Zn Nm + PGPR + ZnO @ 28.0 kg/ha + Rh+ RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1112 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results differ

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc oxide · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

195 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.