Paper · 2017 · Menoufia Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF PLANT DENSITY AND SPRAYING WITH ALUMINUM SILICATE ON FRUIT YIELD AND QUALITY OF PROCESSING TOMATO GROWN IN SUMMER SEASON

A. G. Zakher

20
claims
77
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted during two successive late summer seasons of 2015and 2016 at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73 (Agricultural Almostakbal Association), Giza Governorate. In this study the effects of three plant densities i.e., 14000, 12000 and 10500 plants per fedden along with three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water) were studied. Data collected wereon vegetative growth, flowering characteristics, fruit yield and its quality of processing tomato, hybrid Alissa F1. Kaolin application started fifteen days after transplanting and repeated at every 8 to 10 days until the beginning of fruits coloring stage. The field soil was sandy in texture and drip irrigation system was used. The obtained results showed that using the highest plant density of processing tomato, i.e 14000 plant (30cm spacing between the seedlings) produced the taller plants, high weight of fresh and dry leaves, the highest fruit setting% with high early, total and marketable yield as well as low percentage from sunscald affected fruits. However, such treatment (highest plant density) produced the lowest fruit weight, firmness and fruit contents from vitamin C ,T.S.S as well as pH of juice. The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield with high percentage of unmarketable fruit, but the fruits were bigger, had highest weight, were firmner, and had high concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juice, than those harvested from plants grown in higher densities. Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth, enhanced earliness of flowering and increased fruit setting, total and marketable yield with superior characteristics, i.e, fruit weight, less infection with sunscald fruits, high firmness, high vitamin C, T.S.S as well as pH of juice contents. For that, it can recommend under the condition of planting the processing tomato in the late summer seasons under sandy soil under drip irrigation system with high density plant per fedden(14000 plant), i.e., 30 cm spacing between plants and foliar spraywith 2% aluminum silicate to obtain highest marketable fruit yield and reach to highest productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density (14000 plants per fedden) produced taller plants.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye1
Outcome
taller plantse1
Direction
tallere1
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“using the highest plant density of processing tomato, i.e 14000 plant (30cm spacing between the seedlings) produced the taller plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–944 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density produced high fresh and dry leaf weight.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye1
Outcome
weight of fresh and dry leavese2
Direction
highe2
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“using the highest plant density of processing tomato, i.e 14000 plant (30cm spacing between the seedlings) produced the taller plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–944 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced the taller plants, high weight of fresh and dry leaves, the highest fruit setting% with high early, total and marketable yield as well as low percentage from sunscald affected fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density gave the highest fruit setting percentage.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye1
Outcome
fruit setting%e2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“using the highest plant density of processing tomato, i.e 14000 plant (30cm spacing between the seedlings) produced the taller plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–944 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced the taller plants, high weight of fresh and dry leaves, the highest fruit setting% with high early, total and marketable yield as well as low percentage from sunscald affected fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density gave high early, total and marketable yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye1
Outcome
early, total and marketable yielde2
Direction
highe2
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“using the highest plant density of processing tomato, i.e 14000 plant (30cm spacing between the seedlings) produced the taller plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–944 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced the taller plants, high weight of fresh and dry leaves, the highest fruit setting% with high early, total and marketable yield as well as low percentage from sunscald affected fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density gave a low percentage of sunscald-affected fruits.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye1
Outcome
percentage from sunscald affected fruitse2
Direction
lowe2
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“using the highest plant density of processing tomato, i.e 14000 plant (30cm spacing between the seedlings) produced the taller plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–944 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced the taller plants, high weight of fresh and dry leaves, the highest fruit setting% with high early, total and marketable yield as well as low percentage from sunscald affected fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density produced the lowest fruit weight and firmness.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye3
Outcome
fruit weight, firmnesse3
Direction
loweste3
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, such treatment (highest plant density) produced the lowest fruit weight, firmness and fruit contents from vitamin C ,T.S.S as well as pH of juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1265 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density produced the lowest fruit contents of vitamin C, T.S.S and juice pH.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
highest plant densitye3
Outcome
fruit contents from vitamin C ,T.S.S as well as pH of juicee3
Direction
loweste3
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, such treatment (highest plant density) produced the lowest fruit weight, firmness and fruit contents from vitamin C ,T.S.S as well as pH of juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1265 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
lowest plant densitye4
Outcome
fruit yielde4
Direction
lowe4
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield with high percentage of unmarketable fruit, but the fruits were bigger, had highest weight, were firmner, and had high concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juice, than those harvested from plants grown in higher densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest plant density gave a high percentage of unmarketable fruit.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
lowest plant densitye4
Outcome
percentage of unmarketable fruite4
Direction
highe4
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield with high percentage of unmarketable fruit, but the fruits were bigger, had highest weight, were firmner, and had high concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juice, than those harvested from plants grown in higher densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest plant density gave the highest fruit weight.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
lowest plant densitye4
Outcome
weighte4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield with high percentage of unmarketable fruit, but the fruits were bigger, had highest weight, were firmner, and had high concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juice, than those harvested from plants grown in higher densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest plant density gave firmer fruit.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
lowest plant densitye4
Outcome
firmnesse3
Direction
firmnere4
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, such treatment (highest plant density) produced the lowest fruit weight, firmness and fruit contents from vitamin C ,T.S.S as well as pH of juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1265 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield with high percentage of unmarketable fruit, but the fruits were bigger, had highest weight, were firmner, and had high concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juice, than those harvested from plants grown in higher densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest plant density gave high vitamin C, T.S.S and juice pH contents.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
lowest plant densitye4
Outcome
concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juicee4
Direction
highe4
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest plant density produced low fruit yield with high percentage of unmarketable fruit, but the fruits were bigger, had highest weight, were firmner, and had high concentration from vitamin C, T.S.S and pH of juice, than those harvested from plants grown in higher densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray significantly increased all vegetative growth traits relative to the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
all traits of vegetative growthe1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray enhanced earliness of flowering relative to the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
earliness of floweringe6
Direction
enhancede6
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced earliness of flowering and increased fruit setting, total and marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray increased fruit setting, total and marketable yield relative to the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
fruit setting, total and marketable yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced earliness of flowering and increased fruit setting, total and marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray gave less sunscald infection of fruits than the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
infection with sunscald fruitse7
Direction
lesse7
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
e7

“with superior characteristics, i.e, fruit weight, less infection with sunscald fruits, high firmness, high vitamin C, T.S.S as well as pH of juice contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray gave superior fruit weight relative to the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
fruit weighte7
Direction
superiore7
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
e7

“with superior characteristics, i.e, fruit weight, less infection with sunscald fruits, high firmness, high vitamin C, T.S.S as well as pH of juice contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray gave high fruit firmness relative to the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
firmnesse7
Direction
highe7
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
e7

“with superior characteristics, i.e, fruit weight, less infection with sunscald fruits, high firmness, high vitamin C, T.S.S as well as pH of juice contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% aluminum silicate foliar spray gave high vitamin C, T.S.S and juice pH contents relative to the tap-water control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaoline1
Outcome
vitamin C, T.S.S as well as pH of juice contentse7
Direction
highe7
Qualifier
the level of 2%e1
Comparator
control (tap water)e5
Setting
Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73e0

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“at a private farm on Cairo-Alex Desert Road-Km73”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the effect of foliar spray with aluminum silicate kaolin, it is obvious from the results, that the level of 2% significantly increased all traits of vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1726 · show in text ↑
e5

“three levels of aluminum silicate (kaolin), i.e., 1, 2 and 3% added as foliar spray beside the control (tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
e7

“with superior characteristics, i.e, fruit weight, less infection with sunscald fruits, high firmness, high vitamin C, T.S.S as well as pH of juice contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1971 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend planting processing tomato at 14000 plants per fedden with 2% aluminum silicate spray to obtain the highest marketable fruit yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Outcome
highest marketable fruit yielde1

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“to obtain highest marketable fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2253–2293 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

kaolin · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicate(4-) · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

aluminium atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

kaolin · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicate(4-) · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

kaolin · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

aluminium atom · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.