Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Effect of Seasonal Drought on the Agronomic Performance of Four Banana Genotypes (Musa spp.) in the East African Highlands

Brigitte Uwimana; Yasmín Zorrilla-Fontanesi; Jelle van Wesemael; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Banana (Musa spp.), a perennial (sub-)tropical crop, suffers from seasonal droughts, which are typical of rain-fed agriculture. This study aimed at understanding the effect of seasonal drought on early growth, flowering and yield traits in bananas grown in the East African highlands. A field experiment was set up in North Tanzania using four genotypes from different geographical origins and two different ploidy levels. The treatments considered were exclusively rain-fed versus rain supplemented with irrigation. Growth in plant girth and leaf area were promising traits to detect the early effect of water deficit. Seasonal drought slowed down vegetative growth, thus significantly decreasing plant girth, plant height and the number of suckers produced when compared to irrigated plants. It also delayed flowering time and bunch maturity and had a negative effect on yield traits. However, the results depended on the genotype and crop cycle and their interaction with the treatments. “Nakitengwa”, an East African highland banana (EAHB; AAA genome group), which is adapted to the region, showed sensitivity to drought in terms of reduced bunch weight and expected yield, while “Cachaco” (ABB genome group) showed less sensitivity to drought but had a poorer yield than “Nakitengwa”. Our study confirms that seasonal drought has a negative impact on banana production in East Africa, where EAHBs are the most predominant type of bananas grown in the region. We also show that a drought-tolerant cultivar not adapted to the East African highlands had a low performance in terms of yield. We recommend a large-scale screening of diploid bananas to identify drought-tolerant genotypes to be used in the improvement of locally adapted and accepted varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth in plant girth and leaf area were promising traits to detect the early effect of water deficit in bananas.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
Growth in plant girth and leaf areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth in plant girth and leaf area were promising traits to detect the early effect of water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal drought significantly decreased plant girth, plant height and the number of suckers compared with irrigated plants.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Treatment
Seasonal droughte1
Outcome
plant girth, plant height and the number of suckers producede1
Direction
decreasinge1
Comparator
irrigated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal drought slowed down vegetative growth, thus significantly decreasing plant girth, plant height and the number of suckers produced when compared to irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal drought delayed flowering time and bunch maturity in bananas.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Treatment
Seasonal droughte1
Outcome
flowering time and bunch maturitye2
Direction
delayede2
Comparator
irrigated plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal drought slowed down vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–666 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also delayed flowering time and bunch maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–843 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal drought had a negative effect on banana yield traits.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Treatment
Seasonal droughte1
Outcome
yield traitse2
Direction
negative effecte2
Comparator
irrigated plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal drought slowed down vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–666 · show in text ↑
e2

“had a negative effect on yield traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–885 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–792 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of drought depended on the genotype and crop cycle and on their interaction with the treatments.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Outcome
resultse1
Qualifier
genotype and crop cycle and their interaction with the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“the results depended on the genotype and crop cycle and their interaction with the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The East African highland banana Nakitengwa showed sensitivity to drought in reduced bunch weight and expected yield.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Material
Nakitengwae1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
bunch weight and expected yielde1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

““Nakitengwa”, an East African highland banana (EAHB; AAA genome group), which is adapted to the region, showed sensitivity to drought in terms of reduced bunch weight and expected yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The banana Cachaco (ABB genome group) showed less sensitivity to drought than Nakitengwa.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Material
Cachacoe1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
sensitivity to droughte1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
Nakitengwae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

““Cachaco” (ABB genome group) showed less sensitivity to drought but had a poorer yield than “Nakitengwa””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cachaco had a poorer yield than Nakitengwa.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Material
Cachacoe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
poorere1
Comparator
Nakitengwae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

““Cachaco” (ABB genome group) showed less sensitivity to drought but had a poorer yield than “Nakitengwa””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A drought-tolerant cultivar not adapted to the East African highlands had a low yield performance.

Taxon
Musa spp.Musae0
Material
drought-tolerant cultivare1
Outcome
performance in terms of yielde1
Direction
lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa
Musa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“a drought-tolerant cultivar not adapted to the East African highlands had a low performance in terms of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1591 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a large-scale screening of diploid bananas to identify drought-tolerant genotypes for improving locally adapted varieties.

Taxon
diploid bananase0
Outcome
large-scale screeninge0

Verbatim

e0

“large-scale screening of diploid bananas to identify drought-tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1687 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · MusaResults differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · growth · MusaResults differ

12 papers: 3 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.