Paper · 2020 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Effects of five mycorrhizal fungi on biomass and leaf physiological activities of walnut

Wei-Jin CHENG; Yong-Jie XU; Guang-Ming HUANG; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can benefit many plants, but their effects on walnuts are not yet known. The present study aimed to analyze the effect of five AMF species, namely, Acaulospora scrobiculata, Diversispora spurca, Glomus etunicatum, G. mosseae and G. versiforme on biomass production, chlorophyll contents, sugar fraction contents, and mineral element contents of walnut (Juglans regia L.) seedlings. The five AMF species colonized roots of walnut, established mycorrhizas in roots and hyphae in soil, and released easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein into soil, whilst D. spurca exhibited the best effect. All the AMF inoculations, except A. scrobiculata, stimulated shoot and root biomass production. Mycorrhizal fungal inoculations collectively increased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll a+b concentrations, and thus promoted leaf sucrose accumulation, which provides an important mycorrhiza-carbon source to roots. AMF inoculations conferred a positive effect on leaf N, P, K, Mg, Fe, B, Zn and Cu contents, while they reduced leaf Mn contents. These results concluded that AMF were beneficial to the growth and physiological activities of walnut, which gives the support for the AMF application in walnut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The five AMF species colonized walnut roots and established mycorrhizas and soil hyphae.

Taxon
walnute0
Interactor
AMF speciese0symbiont
Outcome
colonized roots of walnut, established mycorrhizas in roots and hyphae in soile0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The five AMF species colonized roots of walnut, established mycorrhizas in roots and hyphae in soil, and released easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein into soil, whilst D. spurca exhibited the best effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AMF species released glomalin-related soil protein.

Taxon
walnute0
Interactor
AMF speciese0symbiont
Outcome
released easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein into soile0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The five AMF species colonized roots of walnut, established mycorrhizas in roots and hyphae in soil, and released easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein into soil, whilst D. spurca exhibited the best effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. spurca had the best overall effect among the tested fungi.

Taxon
walnute0
Interactor
D. spurcaDiversispora spurcae0symbiont
Outcome
best effecte0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

e0

“The five AMF species colonized roots of walnut, established mycorrhizas in roots and hyphae in soil, and released easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein into soil, whilst D. spurca exhibited the best effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculations except A. scrobiculata stimulated shoot and root biomass.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root biomass productione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
except A. scrobiculatae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All the AMF inoculations, except A. scrobiculata, stimulated shoot and root biomass production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculations increased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll concentrations.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungal inoculationse0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungale0symbiont
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll a+b concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungal inoculations collectively increased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll a+b concentrations, and thus promoted leaf sucrose accumulation, which provides an important mycorrhiza-carbon source to roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation promoted leaf sucrose accumulation.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungal inoculationse0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungale0symbiont
Outcome
leaf sucrose accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungal inoculations collectively increased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll a+b concentrations, and thus promoted leaf sucrose accumulation, which provides an important mycorrhiza-carbon source to roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased leaf N, P and K contents.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf N, P, Ke0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculations conferred a positive effect on leaf N, P, K, Mg, Fe, B, Zn and Cu contents, while they reduced leaf Mn contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased leaf Mg, Fe and B contents.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Mg, Fe, Be0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculations conferred a positive effect on leaf N, P, K, Mg, Fe, B, Zn and Cu contents, while they reduced leaf Mn contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased leaf Zn and Cu contents.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Zn and Cu contentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculations conferred a positive effect on leaf N, P, K, Mg, Fe, B, Zn and Cu contents, while they reduced leaf Mn contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF reduced leaf Mn content.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf Mn contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculations conferred a positive effect on leaf N, P, K, Mg, Fe, B, Zn and Cu contents, while they reduced leaf Mn contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.