Paper · 2020 · Journal of Horticultural Research

Ex vitro Rooting, Acclimatization and Genetic Stability of Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica

Agnieszka Wojtania; Monika Markiewicz; Justyna Góraj-Koniarska

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Ex vitro rooting and acclimatization of two cultivars ‘Wojtek’ and ‘Zojka’ of blue honeysuckle ( Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica Sevast.) were studied. To the ex vitro conditions were transferred rooted and unrooted shoots. The post-effect of auxin type and concentration as well as microcutting and soil substrate types were tested. The genetic stability of the plantlets in relation to the mother plants by using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers has been also determined. It has been found that in vitro rooted cuttings of both cultivars showed a higher survival rate (max. 88%) and better growth and development when they were rooted on a medium containing a low auxin level (1.0 mg·dm −3 ). The results of the second experiment showed successful ex vitro rooting of blue honeysuckle shoots without auxin treatment. Higher ex vitro rooting and survival rate in the greenhouse have been observed for ‘Wojtek’ (max. 96%) than ‘Zojka’ (max. 88%). Better growth and development of shoots and roots were observed on peat alone or a mixture of peat and perlite as compared to a mixture of peat and sand. The micropropagated plantlets appeared similar to mother plants. Molecular analysis confirmed a high level of genetic stability of blue honeysuckle after 2 years of in vitro propagation. However, among the cultivars studied, ‘Wojtek’ showed slightly higher genetic stability than ‘Zojka’ (99.5% and 97.7%, respectively). For ‘Zojka’ plants, the degree of variation was comparable for AFLP and ISSR markers. For ‘Wojtek’, no polymorphism was detected using the ISSR analysis in contrast to the AFLP analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro rooted cuttings of both blue honeysuckle cultivars had a higher survival rate (max. 88%) when rooted on a medium with a low auxin level.

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Treatment
a medium containing a low auxin levele1
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
max. 88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“in vitro rooted cuttings of both cultivars showed a higher survival rate (max. 88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“rooted on a medium containing a low auxin level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro rooted cuttings of both cultivars showed better growth and development when rooted on a medium with a low auxin level.

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Treatment
a medium containing a low auxin levele0
Outcome
growth and developmente0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“better growth and development when they were rooted on a medium containing a low auxin level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ex vitro rooting of blue honeysuckle shoots was successful without auxin treatment.

Taxon
blue honeysuckleLonicera caeruleae0
Outcome
successful ex vitro rootinge0
Qualifier
without auxin treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea
Lonicera caerulea · TaxonOpioła Jerzy (Poland) · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“successful ex vitro rooting of blue honeysuckle shoots without auxin treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ex vitro rooting and survival rate in the greenhouse were higher for cultivar Wojtek (max. 96%) than for Zojka (max. 88%).

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Material
Wojteke0
Outcome
ex vitro rooting and survival ratee0
Direction
Highere0
Value
max. 96%e0
Qualifier
max. 88%e0
Comparator
Zojkae0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher ex vitro rooting and survival rate in the greenhouse have been observed for ‘Wojtek’ (max. 96%) than ‘Zojka’ (max. 88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots and roots grew and developed better on peat alone or a peat-perlite mixture than on a peat-sand mixture.

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Treatment
peat alone or a mixture of peat and perlitee0
Outcome
growth and development of shoots and rootse0
Direction
Bettere0
Comparator
a mixture of peat and sande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Better growth and development of shoots and roots were observed on peat alone or a mixture of peat and perlite as compared to a mixture of peat and sand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The micropropagated plantlets appeared similar to the mother plants.

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Outcome
similar to mother plantse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
mother plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The micropropagated plantlets appeared similar to mother plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molecular analysis confirmed a high level of genetic stability of blue honeysuckle after 2 years of in vitro propagation.

Taxon
blue honeysuckleLonicera caeruleae0
Outcome
high level of genetic stabilitye0
Qualifier
after 2 years of in vitro propagatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea
Lonicera caerulea · TaxonOpioła Jerzy (Poland) · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Molecular analysis confirmed a high level of genetic stability of blue honeysuckle after 2 years of in vitro propagation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Wojtek showed slightly higher genetic stability than Zojka (99.5% and 97.7%, respectively).

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Material
Wojteke0
Outcome
genetic stabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
99.5% and 97.7%e0
Comparator
Zojkae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Wojtek’ showed slightly higher genetic stability than ‘Zojka’ (99.5% and 97.7%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Zojka plants, the degree of variation was comparable for AFLP and ISSR markers.

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Material
Zojkae0
Outcome
degree of variatione0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
AFLP and ISSR markerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“For ‘Zojka’ plants, the degree of variation was comparable for AFLP and ISSR markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Wojtek, no polymorphism was detected with ISSR analysis, in contrast to AFLP analysis.

Taxon
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticaLonicera caerulea var. kamtschaticat0
Material
Wojteke0
Outcome
polymorphisme0
Qualifier
no polymorphism was detected using the ISSR analysise0
Comparator
the AFLP analysise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica
Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica · TaxonBasik07 · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“For ‘Wojtek’, no polymorphism was detected using the ISSR analysis in contrast to the AFLP analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1681 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Lonicera caerulea (blue honeysuckle)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

growing medium · growth · Lonicera caerulea (blue honeysuckle)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.