Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Management of spot blotch disease of wheat in Eastern Uttar Pradesh

Dibya .; SP Singh; Sandeep Kumar; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Spot blotch caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem is one of the most important wheat leaf disease all over world; it appears in almost all wheat growing areas and causes severe yield loss every year. The spot blotch disease caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem is one of the most important wheat leaf diseases all over world, it appears in almost all wheat growing areas and causes severe yield loss every year. For the management of spot blotch disease of wheat one bio-agent, one bio-enhancer and seven fungicides were used. Plant disease intensity decreased with the application of different treatment over untreated control. Minimum plant disease intensity was recorded (21.11 % first year and 20.68% second year) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days), Maximum plant disease intensity was recorded (72.37% first year and 73.68% second year) under T11 (Control), Which has highly significant compared to all the treatments. Maximum grain yield was recorded (38.26 q/ha and 38.47 q/ha first and second year) and maximum thousand seed weight was recorded (41.25g and 41.54g first and second year ) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days), Minimum grain yield was recorded (31.25q/ha and 31.04q/ha during the both year) and minimum thousand seed weight was recorded(35.58g and 35.47g during 2018-19 and 2019-20) under T11 (Control), Which has highly significant compared to all the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments decreased wheat spot blotch intensity versus untreated control.

Treatment
different treatmente0
Outcome
Plant disease intensitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant disease intensity decreased with the application of different treatment over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“spot blotch disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had minimum disease intensity of 21.11% in year one.

Treatment
Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 dayse0
Outcome
plant disease intensitye0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
21.11 %e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum plant disease intensity was recorded (21.11 % first year and 20.68% second year) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“spot blotch disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had minimum disease intensity of 20.68% in year two.

Treatment
Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 dayse0
Outcome
plant disease intensitye0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
20.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum plant disease intensity was recorded (21.11 % first year and 20.68% second year) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“spot blotch disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had maximum disease intensity of 72.37% in year one.

Treatment
Controle0
Outcome
plant disease intensitye0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
72.37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum plant disease intensity was recorded (72.37% first year and 73.68% second year) under T11 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“spot blotch disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had maximum disease intensity of 73.68% in year two.

Treatment
Controle0
Outcome
plant disease intensitye0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
73.68%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum plant disease intensity was recorded (72.37% first year and 73.68% second year) under T11 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“spot blotch disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had maximum grain yield of 38.26 q/ha in year one.

Treatment
Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 dayse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
38.26 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield was recorded (38.26 q/ha and 38.47 q/ha first and second year) and maximum thousand seed weight was recorded (41.25g and 41.54g first and second year ) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had maximum grain yield of 38.47 q/ha in year two.

Treatment
Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 dayse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
38.47 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield was recorded (38.26 q/ha and 38.47 q/ha first and second year) and maximum thousand seed weight was recorded (41.25g and 41.54g first and second year ) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had maximum thousand seed weight of 41.25g in year one.

Treatment
Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 dayse0
Outcome
thousand seed weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41.25ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum thousand seed weight was recorded (41.25g and 41.54g first and second year ) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had maximum thousand seed weight of 41.54g in year two.

Treatment
Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 dayse0
Outcome
thousand seed weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41.54ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum thousand seed weight was recorded (41.25g and 41.54g first and second year ) under T9 (Seed treatment with Raxil @ 2.5 gm/kg seed + 2 foliar sprays of propiconazole @ 0.1 %, first at boot leaf stage second after 20 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had minimum grain yield of 31.25q/ha in year one.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
31.25q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum grain yield was recorded (31.25q/ha and 31.04q/ha during the both year) and minimum thousand seed weight was recorded(35.58g and 35.47g during 2018-19 and 2019-20) under T11 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had minimum grain yield of 31.04q/ha in year two.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
31.04q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum grain yield was recorded (31.25q/ha and 31.04q/ha during the both year) and minimum thousand seed weight was recorded(35.58g and 35.47g during 2018-19 and 2019-20) under T11 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had minimum thousand seed weight of 35.58g in 2018-19.

Outcome
thousand seed weighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
35.58ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum thousand seed weight was recorded(35.58g and 35.47g during 2018-19 and 2019-20) under T11 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had minimum thousand seed weight of 35.47g in 2019-20.

Outcome
thousand seed weighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
35.47ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum thousand seed weight was recorded(35.58g and 35.47g during 2018-19 and 2019-20) under T11 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

propiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

transgenic · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

transgenic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.