Paper · 2021 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of different agricultural treatments on narrowing winter wheat yield gap and nitrogen use efficiency in China

Feng-mei YAO; Qin-ying LI; Rui-yun ZENG; et al.

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Under the limited cultivated land area and the pursuit of sustainable agricultural development, it is essential for the safety of grain production to study agricultural management approaches on narrowing the winter wheat yield gap and improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in China. In this study, DSSAT-CERES-Wheat Model is used to simulate winter wheat yield under different agricultural treatments, and we analyze yield gaps and NUE with different management scenarios at regional scales and evaluate the suitable approaches for reducing yield gap and increasing NUE. The results show that, the potential of narrowing yield gap ranges 300–900 kg ha–1 with soil nutrients increase, 400–1 200 kg ha–1 with sowing date adjustment and 0–400 kg ha–1 with planting density increase as well as 700–2 200 kg ha–1 with adding nitrogen fertilizer. Contribution rates of management measures of soil nutrients, sowing date adjusting, planting density, and nitrogen fertilizers are 5–15%, 5–15%, 0–4%, and 10–20%, respectively. Difference in nitrogen partial productivity ranges 3–10 kg kg–1 for soil nutrients, 1–10 kg kg–1 for sowing date adjusting, 1–5 kg kg–1 for planting density increase, and –12–0 kg kg–1 for adding nitrogen fertilizers, respectively. It indicates that four treatments can narrow yield gap and improve the NUE in varying degrees, but increasing nitrogen fertilizer leads to the decrease of NUE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil nutrients narrowed the simulated wheat yield gap by 300–900 kg ha–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
soil nutrients increasee0
Outcome
yield gape0
Direction
narrowinge0
Value
300–900 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potential of narrowing yield gap ranges 300–900 kg ha–1 with soil nutrients increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Adjusting sowing date narrowed the simulated wheat yield gap by 400–1 200 kg ha–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing date adjustmente0
Outcome
yield gape1
Direction
narrowinge1
Value
400–1 200 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“400–1 200 kg ha–1 with sowing date adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“narrowing yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density narrowed the simulated wheat yield gap by 0–400 kg ha–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting density increasee0
Outcome
yield gape1
Direction
narrowinge1
Value
0–400 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0–400 kg ha–1 with planting density increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“narrowing yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Adding nitrogen fertilizer narrowed the simulated wheat yield gap by 700–2 200 kg ha–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
adding nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yield gape1
Direction
narrowinge1
Value
700–2 200 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“700–2 200 kg ha–1 with adding nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–841 · show in text ↑
e1

“narrowing yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient management contributed 5–15% to narrowing the yield gap.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
soil nutrientse0
Outcome
Contribution ratese0
Value
5–15%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contribution rates of management measures of soil nutrients, sowing date adjusting, planting density, and nitrogen fertilizers are 5–15%, 5–15%, 0–4%, and 10–20%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date adjustment contributed 5–15% to narrowing the yield gap.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing date adjustinge0
Outcome
Contribution ratese0
Value
5–15%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contribution rates of management measures of soil nutrients, sowing date adjusting, planting density, and nitrogen fertilizers are 5–15%, 5–15%, 0–4%, and 10–20%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density management contributed 0–4% to narrowing the yield gap.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
Contribution ratese0
Value
0–4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contribution rates of management measures of soil nutrients, sowing date adjusting, planting density, and nitrogen fertilizers are 5–15%, 5–15%, 0–4%, and 10–20%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer management contributed 10–20% to narrowing the yield gap.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
Contribution ratese0
Value
10–20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contribution rates of management measures of soil nutrients, sowing date adjusting, planting density, and nitrogen fertilizers are 5–15%, 5–15%, 0–4%, and 10–20%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient management changed nitrogen partial productivity by 3–10 kg kg–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
soil nutrientse0
Outcome
nitrogen partial productivitye0
Value
3–10 kg kg–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Difference in nitrogen partial productivity ranges 3–10 kg kg–1 for soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date adjustment changed nitrogen partial productivity by 1–10 kg kg–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing date adjustinge0
Outcome
nitrogen partial productivitye1
Value
1–10 kg kg–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1–10 kg kg–1 for sowing date adjusting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Difference in nitrogen partial productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density changed nitrogen partial productivity by 1–5 kg kg–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting density increasee0
Outcome
nitrogen partial productivitye1
Value
1–5 kg kg–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1–5 kg kg–1 for planting density increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“Difference in nitrogen partial productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Adding nitrogen fertilizer decreased nitrogen partial productivity by –12–0 kg kg–1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
adding nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
nitrogen partial productivitye2
Direction
decreasee1
Value
–12–0 kg kg–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“–12–0 kg kg–1 for adding nitrogen fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen fertilizer leads to the decrease of NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1410 · show in text ↑
e2

“Difference in nitrogen partial productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑

soil · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.