Paper · 2020 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Response of Split Application of Nutrients through Fertigation in Pigeonpea

S.U. Kakade; J.P. Deshmukh; N.D. Parlawar; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background: Among the different production factors, irrigation and nutrient management are of immense importance in Pigeon pea cultivation. Drip irrigation can be considered as an efficient irrigation system to maintain optimum moisture content in the root zone. Split application of fertilizers at appropriate stages of crop growth ensure a regular flow of both water and nutrients resulting in increased growth rate and higher yield. Fertigation proposed as a means to increase efficient use of water and fertilizer to increase yield and sustained irrigated agriculture. The current study aims to study the efficacy of split application of N, P and K on growth, water and nutrient use efficiency, productivity and profitability of Pigeon pea. Methods: The field experiment was conducted at Department of Agronomy Farm, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during three consecutive kharif season of 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19. The experiment was laid out in randomised block design with four replications and eight treatments with an objective to study the efficacy of split application of nutrients on growth, water and nutrient use efficiency, productivity and profitability of Pigeon pea. Result: The results revealed that, all the growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yield of Pigeon pea were substantially enhanced by drip fertigation levels at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPK than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100%) and over conventional soil application of recommended dose of NPK kg ha-1. Drip fertigation at 125:100:100 per cent recommended dose of NPK ha-1 recorded higher pigeon-pea pooled grain yield of 4053 kg ha-1. The maximum GMR (Rs.226807 ha-1), NMR (Rs.176604 ha-1), B:C ratio (4.52) and highest economic efficiency of Rs.883 day-1 ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPK enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yield of pigeon pea relative to lower fertigation levels.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
drip fertigation levels at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPKe0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
lower fertigation levels (75 and 100%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yield of Pigeon pea were substantially enhanced by drip fertigation levels at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPK than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100%) and over conventional soil application of recommended dose of NPK kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPK enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yield of pigeon pea relative to conventional soil application of NPK.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
drip fertigation levels at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPKe0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
conventional soil application of recommended dose of NPK kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yield of Pigeon pea were substantially enhanced by drip fertigation levels at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPK than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100%) and over conventional soil application of recommended dose of NPK kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125:100:100 per cent recommended NPK gave a higher pooled grain yield of 4053 kg/ha in pigeon pea.

Taxon
pigeon-peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Drip fertigation at 125:100:100 per cent recommended dose of NPK ha-1e0
Outcome
pooled grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4053 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip fertigation at 125:100:100 per cent recommended dose of NPK ha-1 recorded higher pigeon-pea pooled grain yield of 4053 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum gross monetary returns recorded was Rs.226807 per ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
GMRe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs.226807 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum GMR (Rs.226807 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The net monetary returns recorded was Rs.176604 per ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
NMRe0
Value
Rs.176604 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NMR (Rs.176604 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit:cost ratio recorded was 4.52.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
4.52e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B:C ratio (4.52)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest economic efficiency recorded was Rs.883 per day per ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
economic efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.883 day-1 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest economic efficiency of Rs.883 day-1 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.