Paper · 2020 · Naukovì dopovìdì Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu bìoresursiv ì prirodokoristuvannâ Ukraïni

Influence of elements of growing technology on corn productivity

M. Orlovskyi; A. Kosiuk; A. Ishchuk; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The results of research on the effect of pre-sowing treatment of seeds and plants with Vimpel-2, Oracle multicomplex, Oracle zinc separately and together in different phases of maize plants of the early hybrid DN Meotida are presented. The research was conducted by us in the field conditions of Khmelnytsky SARS IFAP NAAS of Ukraine (2018-2020). As a result of the conducted researches the following conclusions are made. The combination of pre-sowing treatment of seeds with subsequent treatment of corn crops in the early stages of development of the complex of drugs provided an increase in height of corn plants, corn plant height increased, on average over the years by 26,0 cm or 11,5%, leaf surface area by 0,075 m2 or 23,5%. All studied variants of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar fertilization provided an increase in the number of productive cobs, compared to the control, by 2-9 pcs. or 2-9 % - on average over the years of research. All studied methods of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of corn in the early stages of growth provided an increase, on average over the years of research, the weight of grain from 1 head of corn by 9,0-29,2 g or 7,8-25,5%, weight gain 1000 grains - by 18,0-29,3 g or 6,8-11,2% compared to the control. All studied methods of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of maize plants in the early stages of development provided a significant increase in grain yield compared to control – 0,65-1,62 t / ha or 9,1-22,6%, on average for two years of research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined pre-sowing seed treatment and subsequent treatment of corn crops with the complex of drugs increased corn plant height on average over the years by 26,0 cm or 11,5%.

Treatment
pre-sowing treatment of seeds with subsequent treatment of corn cropse0
Outcome
corn plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26,0 cm or 11,5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of pre-sowing treatment of seeds with subsequent treatment of corn crops in the early stages of development of the complex of drugs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn plant height increased, on average over the years by 26,0 cm or 11,5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combined treatment increased leaf surface area on average over the years by 0,075 m2 or 23,5%.

Treatment
pre-sowing treatment of seeds with subsequent treatment of corn cropse0
Outcome
leaf surface areae1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
0,075 m2 or 23,5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of pre-sowing treatment of seeds with subsequent treatment of corn crops in the early stages of development of the complex of drugs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf surface area by 0,075 m2 or 23,5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All studied variants of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar fertilization increased the number of productive cobs by 2-9 pcs. or 2-9 % compared with the control.

Treatment
pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar fertilizatione0
Outcome
number of productive cobse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-9 pcs. or 2-9 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All studied variants of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar fertilization provided an increase in the number of productive cobs, compared to the control, by 2-9 pcs. or 2-9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of corn increased grain weight per head on average over the years by 9,0-29,2 g or 7,8-25,5%.

Treatment
pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of corne0
Outcome
weight of grain from 1 head of corne0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9,0-29,2 g or 7,8-25,5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All studied methods of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of corn in the early stages of growth provided an increase, on average over the years of research, the weight of grain from 1 head of corn by 9,0-29,2 g or 7,8-25,5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same methods increased 1000-grain weight by 18,0-29,3 g or 6,8-11,2% compared with the control.

Treatment
pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of corne0
Outcome
weight gain 1000 grainse1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
18,0-29,3 g or 6,8-11,2%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“weight gain 1000 grains - by 18,0-29,3 g or 6,8-11,2% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All studied methods of pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of maize significantly increased grain yield by 0,65-1,62 t / ha or 9,1-22,6% compared with the control on average for two years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of maize plantse0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0,65-1,62 t / ha or 9,1-22,6%e2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-sowing seed treatment and foliar feeding of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1348 · show in text ↑
e1

“provided a significant increase in grain yield compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1450 · show in text ↑
e2

“0,65-1,62 t / ha or 9,1-22,6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1482 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

80 papers: 73 positive, 7 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

seed treatment · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

micronutrient · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.