Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Study the effect of integrated disease management approach on germination, plant height and yield of potato and on severity of late blight of potato Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary.

Vinay Kumar; Ramesh Singh; RK Doharey; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Late blight of potato caused by Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary is one of the most serious diseases of potato. Several management practices have been adopted so for to minimize the disease. But in present investigation based on laboratory and glass house condition revealed that soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulation provided good protection against late blight and also stimulate the germination. The data showed that the plant height of potato was maximum in treatments T1(Soil application of FYM @ 125gm/pot +mushroom waste with T. harzianum @ 5gm/gm+tuber treatment with Azotobacter @ 5%+foliar spray with Ridomil @ 0.25%) with the value of 44.9 cm at 30 days age of plant. Tuber treatment with bio agents stimulated the germination per cent of the tuber. The Maximum germination per cent was noted in case of T1(Soil application of FYM @ 125gm/pot+mushroom waste with T. harzianum@ 5gm/kg+tuber treatment with Azotobacter@5%+foliar spray with Ridomil@0.25%). Growth promoting effects of the soil amendment+ tuber treatment + foliar spray were also perceived. The fungicides and bio agents were found to increase the plant length over control. Foliar spray with the fungicides pathogenic inoculation protected the plants against infection resulting reduced disease severity. The minimum disease severity (10.66) was reported from treatments were given as treatment T1(Soil application of FYM 125gm/pot+ mushroom waste with T. harzianum 5gm/kg +tuber treatment with Azotobacter @5%+foliar spray Ridomil @ 0.25%) treated plants against 82.33% disease severity in case of control. The integrated effect o FYM+ mushroom waste as soil application bioformulation as tuber 51.67gm, and total weight of tuber 338.33gm, where trea tment was given as soil application of FYM @125gm/pot+ mushroom waste with T. harzianum@ 5gm/kg+tuber treatment with T. harzianum @5%+foliar spray with 665.02gm was recorded from treatment T1(Soil application of FYM 125gm/pot +mushroom waste T. harzianum @ 5gm/kg+tuber treatment with Azotobacter@ 5%+foliar spray with Ridomil @ 0.25%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulation protected potato against late blight.

Treatment
soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulatione0
Outcome
late blighte0
Direction
good protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulation provided good protection against late blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulation stimulated potato germination.

Treatment
soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulatione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application and tuber seed dressing with bioformulation provided good protection against late blight and also stimulate the germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 produced maximum potato plant height of 44.9 cm at 30 days.

Treatment
T1(Soil application of FYM @ 125gm/pot +mushroom waste with T. harzianum @ 5gm/gm+tuber treatment with Azotobacter @ 5%+foliar spray with Ridomil @ 0.25%)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.9 cme0
Qualifier
30 days age of plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height of potato was maximum in treatments T1(Soil application of FYM @ 125gm/pot +mushroom waste with T. harzianum @ 5gm/gm+tuber treatment with Azotobacter @ 5%+foliar spray with Ridomil @ 0.25%) with the value of 44.9 cm at 30 days age of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber bioagent treatment stimulated potato tuber germination percentage.

Treatment
Tuber treatment with bio agentse0
Outcome
germination per cent of the tubere0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuber treatment with bio agents stimulated the germination per cent of the tuber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 gave the maximum potato tuber germination percentage.

Treatment
T1(Soil application of FYM @ 125gm/pot+mushroom waste with T. harzianum@ 5gm/kg+tuber treatment with Azotobacter@5%+foliar spray with Ridomil@0.25%)e0
Outcome
germination per cente0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum germination per cent was noted in case of T1(Soil application of FYM @ 125gm/pot+mushroom waste with T. harzianum@ 5gm/kg+tuber treatment with Azotobacter@5%+foliar spray with Ridomil@0.25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment, tuber treatment and foliar spray promoted potato growth.

Treatment
soil amendment+ tuber treatment + foliar spraye0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth promoting effects of the soil amendment+ tuber treatment + foliar spray were also perceived”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased potato plant length over control.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
plant lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides and bio agents were found to increase the plant length over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagents increased potato plant length over control.

Treatment
bio agentse0
Outcome
plant lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides and bio agents were found to increase the plant length over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicide spray protected inoculated potato plants against infection and reduced disease severity.

Treatment
Foliar spray with the fungicidese0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with the fungicides pathogenic inoculation protected the plants against infection resulting reduced disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had minimum disease severity of 10.66 versus 82.33% in control.

Treatment
T1(Soil application of FYM 125gm/pot+ mushroom waste with T. harzianum 5gm/kg +tuber treatment with Azotobacter @5%+foliar spray Ridomil @ 0.25%)e0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
10.66e0
Qualifier
82.33%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum disease severity (10.66) was reported from treatments were given as treatment T1(Soil application of FYM 125gm/pot+ mushroom waste with T. harzianum 5gm/kg +tuber treatment with Azotobacter @5%+foliar spray Ridomil @ 0.25%) treated plants against 82.33% disease severity in case of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of potato and on severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–123 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fungicide · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

transgenic · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

other · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 33 positive, 15 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.