Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of pre-harvest application of GA3, Naphthalene acetic acid and borax on fruit drop, yield and quality of Mango cv. Amrapali

PK Maurya; VK Tripathi; Shubham Gupta

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To investigate the effect of pre-harvest application of GA3, Naphthalene acetic acid and borax on fruit drop, yield and quality of Mango cv. Amrapali, an experiment was carried out in the Garden, Department of Horticulture, C. S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur (U.P.) during the cropping season 2018-2019. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replication and ten treatments viz., GA3 @ 25 ppm (T1), GA3 @ 50 ppm (T2), GA3 @ 75 ppm (T3), NAA @ 20 ppm (T4), NAA @ 40 ppm (T5), NAA @ 40 ppm (T6), NAA @ 60 ppm (T7), borax @ 0.2% (T8), borax @ 0.4% (T9) including a control or water spray (T10). Spraying of plant growth regulators and micronutrient was done at pea stage of fruits set on 2st March, 2019.From the results obtained during present experimentation, it is reported that pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43). Plants sprayed with the GA3 at 50 ppm results significantly more fruit yield (50.67 kg/tree) of fruits having more polar (9.11 cm) and equatorial diameter (7.39 cm), more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%). Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm, whereas titratable acidity (0.50%) contents in the fruits ware drastically reduced under this treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 25 ppm significantly decreased fruit drop to 85.77%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 25 ppme0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
85.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruit retention to 14.23%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 25 ppme0
Outcome
fruit retentione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.23 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruits per panicle to 6.43.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 25 ppme0
Outcome
number of fruits per paniclee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
6.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm significantly increased fruit yield to 50.67 kg/tree.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 50 ppme0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
50.67 kg/treee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with the GA3 at 50 ppm results significantly more fruit yield (50.67 kg/tree) of fruits having more polar (9.11 cm) and equatorial diameter (7.39 cm), more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm increased polar fruit diameter to 9.11 cm.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
polare0
Direction
moree0
Value
9.11 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more polar (9.11 cm) and equatorial diameter (7.39 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm increased equatorial diameter to 7.39 cm.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
equatorial diametere0
Direction
moree0
Value
7.39 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more polar (9.11 cm) and equatorial diameter (7.39 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp proportion to 74.56%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
pulpe0
Direction
moree0
Value
74.56%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp to stone ratio to 7.12.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
pulp: stone ratioe0
Direction
moree0
Value
7.12e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm decreased peel proportion to 14.94%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
peele0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
14.94%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm decreased stone proportion to 10.51%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
stone per cente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
10.51%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm increased fruit weight to 244.59 g.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 75 ppme0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
244.59 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm increased fruit volume to 255.43 cc.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 75 ppme0
Outcome
volumee0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
255.43 cce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm increased specific gravity to 1.09 g/cc.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 75 ppme0
Outcome
specific gravitye0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
1.09 g/cce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm increased total soluble solids to 18.36 0Brix.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 75 ppme0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
18.36 0Brixe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm increased total sugars to 17.75%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 75 ppme0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
17.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm increased ascorbic acid to 37.60 mg/100g.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment
GA3 at 75 ppme0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
37.60 mg/100ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fruit weight (244.59 g), volume (255.43 cc), specific gravity (1.09 g/cc), total soluble solids (18.36 0Brix), total sugars (17.75%), ascorbic acid (37.60 mg/100g) were also found with the pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 75 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 75 ppm reduced titratable acidity to 0.50%.

Taxon
Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
drastically reducede0
Value
0.50%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas titratable acidity (0.50%) contents in the fruits ware drastically reduced under this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.