Paper · 2021 · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Grain, oil, and protein production on soybean stems and branches under reduced densities

F. Werner; M.A.A. Silva; A.S. Ferreira; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The reduction of sowing density is a strategy that aims to reduce production costs with no losses in grain yield. This study aimed to evaluate the yield components and contents of protein and oil in grains from branches and stems of two soybean cultivars as a function of the reduction in sowing density. The experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (2016/17 and 2017/18) in Londrina, PR, Brazil. Two soybean cultivars were evaluated: BRS 1010 IPRO and NS 5959 IPRO. The experimental design was completely randomized blocks in a split-plot scheme, with five replications. Plots consisted of five sowing densities (100, 80, 60, 40, and 20% of that indicated by the cultivar breeder) and subplots consisted of two plant strata (branches and stems). The number of pods m?2 and grain, protein, and oil yield increased in the branches and decreased in the stems with a decrease in sowing density. The number of grains per pod is higher in the stems than in the branches, regardless of the cultivar. The protein content in the grains is higher in the branches than in the stems for the cultivar BRS 1010 IPRO and decreased with a reduction in sowing density. The thousand-grain weight of the cultivar NS 5959 IPRO decreased with a reduction in sowing density. The oil content in the grains was not influenced by the studied factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing density increased branch pod number and grain, protein, and oil yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Organ / stage
branchese0
Treatment
decrease in sowing densitye0
Outcome
number of pods m?2 and grain, protein, and oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of pods m?2 and grain, protein, and oil yield increased in the branches and decreased in the stems with a decrease in sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing density decreased stem pod number and grain, protein, and oil yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
decrease in sowing densitye0
Outcome
number of pods m?2 and grain, protein, and oil yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of pods m?2 and grain, protein, and oil yield increased in the branches and decreased in the stems with a decrease in sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean stems had more grains per pod than branches, regardless of cultivar.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
number of grains per pode0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
branchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of grains per pod is higher in the stems than in the branches, regardless of the cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS 1010 IPRO branch grains had higher protein content than stem grains.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
BRS 1010 IPROe0
Organ / stage
branchese0
Outcome
protein content in the grainse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
stemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content in the grains is higher in the branches than in the stems for the cultivar BRS 1010 IPRO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content in BRS 1010 IPRO grains decreased with lower sowing density.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
BRS 1010 IPROe0
Treatment
reduction in sowing densitye0
Outcome
protein content in the grainse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content in the grains is higher in the branches than in the stems for the cultivar BRS 1010 IPRO and decreased with a reduction in sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS 5959 IPRO thousand-grain weight decreased as sowing density fell.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
NS 5959 IPROe0
Treatment
reduction in sowing densitye0
Outcome
thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The thousand-grain weight of the cultivar NS 5959 IPRO decreased with a reduction in sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1262 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Studied density and stratum factors did not influence grain oil content.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
five sowing densitiese2
Outcome
oil content in the grainse0
Direction
not influencede0
Qualifier
two plant strata (branches and stems)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The oil content in the grains was not influenced by the studied factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1335 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–254 · show in text ↑
e2

“five sowing densities (100, 80, 60, 40, and 20% of that indicated by the cultivar breeder) and subplots consisted of two plant strata (branches and stems)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–754 · show in text ↑

density · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

density · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 207 positive, 98 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.