Abstract
A field study was conducted to assess the effect of macronutrient fertilizer mixtures over the quality parameters and nutrient use efficiency of cotton at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. The treatment comprised of fertilizer mixtures of different sources for particular macronutrient (for nitrogen (urea and calcium nitrate), for phosphorus (single superphosphate), for potassium (muriate of potash and sulphate of potash) and for nitrogen and phosphorus (mono ammonium phosphate, di ammonium phosphate and ammonium sulphate phosphate)). It was observed that in cotton, agronomic efficiency was considerably increased due to application of calcium nitrate containing fertilizer mixture (calcium nitrate + di-ammonium phosphate + muriate of potash). No significant difference was recorded in quality parameters of the fiber whereas protein and oil content was increased by the application of sulfur containing fertilizer mixtures (calcium nitrate + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash and urea + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash respectively).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Application of a calcium nitrate containing fertilizer mixture considerably increased agronomic efficiency of cotton in a field study
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- calcium nitrate containing fertilizer mixturee1
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiencye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field study was conducted to assess the effect of macronutrient fertilizer mixtures over the quality parameters and nutrient use efficiency of cotton at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”
e1“It was observed that in cotton, agronomic efficiency was considerably increased due to application of calcium nitrate containing fertilizer mixture”
Claim · model-written summary
Macronutrient fertilizer mixtures of different sources did not significantly change fiber quality parameters of cotton
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- macronutrient fertilizer mixturese0
- Outcome
- quality parameters of the fibere2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field study was conducted to assess the effect of macronutrient fertilizer mixtures over the quality parameters and nutrient use efficiency of cotton at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”
e2“No significant difference was recorded in quality parameters of the fiber”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of sulfur containing fertilizer mixture (calcium nitrate + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash) increased protein of cotton
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- calcium nitrate + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potashe3
- Outcome
- proteine3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field study was conducted to assess the effect of macronutrient fertilizer mixtures over the quality parameters and nutrient use efficiency of cotton at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”
e3“protein and oil content was increased by the application of sulfur containing fertilizer mixtures (calcium nitrate + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash and urea + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of sulfur containing fertilizer mixture (urea + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash) increased oil content of cotton
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- urea + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potashe3
- Outcome
- oil contente3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field study was conducted to assess the effect of macronutrient fertilizer mixtures over the quality parameters and nutrient use efficiency of cotton at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”
e3“protein and oil content was increased by the application of sulfur containing fertilizer mixtures (calcium nitrate + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash and urea + di-ammonium phosphate + sulphate of potash respectively)”
The same questions in other papers
diammonium hydrogen phosphate · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
potassium · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nitrogen · quality: oil · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
125 papers more in this group
See all 129 papers →potassium · quality: oil · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.