Paper · 2021 · AGRINULA Jurnal Agroteknologi dan Perkebunan

Response of Soil and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on the Application of Several Local Microorganism and Manures

Elisabeth Sri Pujiastuti; Ferlist Rio Siahaan; Yanto Raya Tampubolon; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Introduction: This research was conducted to determine the effect of several types of local microorganism solutions and manures on the growth and yield of peanut and their impact on the physical properties of ultisols. Materials and Methods: The researches was conducted in Simalingkar B, Medan using Factorial Randomized Block Design within three replications. The first factor was types of microbe sources of local microbial solutions, include un-treated waste (M0), pineapple (M1), orange (M2), and tamarillo (M3) wastes. The second factor was manure types, inluce un-treated manure (P0), chicken (P1), cow (P2), and goat (P3) manures. The parameters were: soil physical characteristics (bulk density, water content and total of pore space), plant height, stem diameter, number of pods, and dry seeds yield. Results: The types of local microorganism solutions only affect to plant height of peanut, but has insignificant effect on the physical properties of ultisols, and stem diameter, the number of filled pods.plant-1, and the dry seeds yield.ha-1 of peanut. The types of manure had significantly effected on plant height and number of filled pods.plant-1, but had insignificant effect on stem diameter, dry seeds yield.ha-1 and the physical properties of ultisols. The interaction of MOL sources and manure did not significantly affect the growth and yield of peanut as well as the physical properties of ultisols. Orange MOL and chicken manure could be increase the plant height of peanut by 18.61% and 6.75%, respectively, compared to un-treated. Goat manure showed the highest number of pods.plant-1 by 6.32% compared to un-treated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local microorganism solution type affected peanut height.

Treatment
types of local microorganism solutionse0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The types of local microorganism solutions only affect to plant height of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Local microorganism solution type had no significant effect on soil physical properties.

Treatment
types of local microorganism solutionse1
Outcome
physical properties of ultisolse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but has insignificant effect on the physical properties of ultisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Soil and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on the Application of Several Local Microorganism and Manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The types of local microorganism solutions only affect to plant height of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Local microorganism solution type had no significant effect on peanut stem diameter, filled pods or dry seed yield.

Treatment
types of local microorganism solutionse0
Outcome
stem diameter, the number of filled pods.plant-1, and the dry seeds yield.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The types of local microorganism solutions only affect to plant height of peanut, but has insignificant effect on the physical properties of ultisols, and stem diameter, the number of filled pods.plant-1, and the dry seeds yield.ha-1 of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure type significantly affected peanut height and filled pod number.

Treatment
types of manuree0
Outcome
plant height and number of filled pods.plant-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The types of manure had significantly effected on plant height and number of filled pods.plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure type had no significant effect on stem diameter and dry seed yield.

Treatment
types of manuree1
Outcome
stem diameter, dry seeds yield.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had insignificant effect on stem diameter, dry seeds yield.ha-1 and the physical properties of ultisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Soil and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on the Application of Several Local Microorganism and Manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The types of manure had significantly effected on plant height and number of filled pods.plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The local microbial solution by manure interaction did not significantly affect peanut growth and yield or soil physical properties.

Treatment
interaction of MOL sources and manuree0
Outcome
growth and yield of peanut as well as the physical properties of ultisolse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of MOL sources and manure did not significantly affect the growth and yield of peanut as well as the physical properties of ultisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange MOL increased peanut height by 18.61% versus untreated.

Treatment
Orange MOLe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18.61%e0
Comparator
un-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orange MOL and chicken manure could be increase the plant height of peanut by 18.61% and 6.75%, respectively, compared to un-treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure increased peanut height by 6.75% versus untreated.

Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.75%e0
Comparator
un-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orange MOL and chicken manure could be increase the plant height of peanut by 18.61% and 6.75%, respectively, compared to un-treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat manure gave the highest pod number, 6.32% above untreated.

Treatment
Goat manuree0
Outcome
number of pods.plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.32%e0
Comparator
un-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Goat manure showed the highest number of pods.plant-1 by 6.32% compared to un-treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.