Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Feasibility and Possibility of Transplanted Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) under Different Spacing and Nutrient Management Practices

Sweta Shikta Mahapatra; Chandra Bhushan; Anil Shukla; et al.

9
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand). The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design with three replications having four planting methods as the main plot treatments viz; Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm, Transplanting at 60 x 20 cm, 90 x 40 cm and 90 x 60 cm, and three nutrient management practices as Sub plot treatments viz; 100 % RDF (12:32:16 NPK fertilizer @ 150 kg ha-1), Vermicompost at 5 ton ha-1 and 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1. The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’. The growth, yield, soil quality and economics of pigeonpea crop were found to be significantly influenced by various planting methods and nutrient management practices. Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area. The grain yield was 32.6 and 34.7 % higher over that of the Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. The combination of inorganic and organic sources led to significantly better microbial population along during both the years. The maximum gross returns were obtained in case of Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacing. Among the nutrient management practices, the gross returns were highest with 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1. Thus for sustained productivity of pigeon pea, it can be transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacing and for nutrient application integration of 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1 could be taken as the most promising practices for System of Pigeonpea Intensification.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm gave the highest grain yield of pigeonpea in both years.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Material
Pant Arhar 291e1
Treatment
Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
during both the yearse2
Setting
Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield at 90 x 40 cm transplanting was attributed to relatively higher plant population per unit area.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Qualifier
relatively higher plant population per unit areae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was 32.6% higher at transplanting 90 x 40 cm than at conventional sowing 60 x 20 cm in 2018-19.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Material
Pant Arhar 291e1
Treatment
Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
32.6e3
Qualifier
2018-19e3
Comparator
Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cme3
Setting
Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
e3

“The grain yield was 32.6 and 34.7 % higher over that of the Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was 34.7% higher at transplanting 90 x 40 cm than at conventional sowing 60 x 20 cm in 2019-20.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Material
Pant Arhar 291e1
Treatment
Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
34.7 %e3
Qualifier
2019-20e3
Comparator
Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cme3
Setting
Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
e3

“The grain yield was 32.6 and 34.7 % higher over that of the Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of inorganic and organic nutrient sources gave significantly better microbial population during both years.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Material
Pant Arhar 291e1
Treatment
combination of inorganic and organic sourcese4
Outcome
microbial populatione4
Direction
bettere4
Qualifier
during both the yearse4
Setting
Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–665 · show in text ↑
e4

“The combination of inorganic and organic sources led to significantly better microbial population along during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum gross returns were obtained with transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacing.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Material
Pant Arhar 291e1
Treatment
Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacinge5
Outcome
gross returnse5
Direction
maximume5
Setting
Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–665 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum gross returns were obtained in case of Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among nutrient management practices, gross returns were highest with 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Material
Pant Arhar 291e1
Treatment
50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1e6
Outcome
gross returnse6
Direction
higheste6
Setting
Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–665 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among the nutrient management practices, the gross returns were highest with 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1442 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For sustained productivity, pigeonpea can be transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacing.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacinge7
Outcome
sustained productivitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“Thus for sustained productivity of pigeon pea, it can be transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1535 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1 could be taken as the most promising nutrient practice for the System of Pigeonpea Intensification.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1e2
Outcome
most promising practicese2
Qualifier
System of Pigeonpea Intensificatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“for nutrient application integration of 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1 could be taken as the most promising practices for System of Pigeonpea Intensification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1705 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

transplanting · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.