Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand). The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design with three replications having four planting methods as the main plot treatments viz; Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm, Transplanting at 60 x 20 cm, 90 x 40 cm and 90 x 60 cm, and three nutrient management practices as Sub plot treatments viz; 100 % RDF (12:32:16 NPK fertilizer @ 150 kg ha-1), Vermicompost at 5 ton ha-1 and 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1. The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’. The growth, yield, soil quality and economics of pigeonpea crop were found to be significantly influenced by various planting methods and nutrient management practices. Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area. The grain yield was 32.6 and 34.7 % higher over that of the Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. The combination of inorganic and organic sources led to significantly better microbial population along during both the years. The maximum gross returns were obtained in case of Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacing. Among the nutrient management practices, the gross returns were highest with 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1. Thus for sustained productivity of pigeon pea, it can be transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacing and for nutrient application integration of 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1 could be taken as the most promising practices for System of Pigeonpea Intensification.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm gave the highest grain yield of pigeonpea in both years.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Material
- Pant Arhar 291e1
- Treatment
- Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Qualifier
- during both the yearse2
- Setting
- Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”
e1“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”
e2“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest grain yield at 90 x 40 cm transplanting was attributed to relatively higher plant population per unit area.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Qualifier
- relatively higher plant population per unit areae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e2“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was 32.6% higher at transplanting 90 x 40 cm than at conventional sowing 60 x 20 cm in 2018-19.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Material
- Pant Arhar 291e1
- Treatment
- Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 32.6e3
- Qualifier
- 2018-19e3
- Comparator
- Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cme3
- Setting
- Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”
e1“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”
e2“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”
e3“The grain yield was 32.6 and 34.7 % higher over that of the Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was 34.7% higher at transplanting 90 x 40 cm than at conventional sowing 60 x 20 cm in 2019-20.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Material
- Pant Arhar 291e1
- Treatment
- Transplanting at 90 x 40 cme2
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 34.7 %e3
- Qualifier
- 2019-20e3
- Comparator
- Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cme3
- Setting
- Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”
e1“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”
e2“Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm recorded the highest grain yield during both the years due to relatively higher plant population per unit area”
e3“The grain yield was 32.6 and 34.7 % higher over that of the Conventional Sowing at 60 x 20 cm during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of inorganic and organic nutrient sources gave significantly better microbial population during both years.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Material
- Pant Arhar 291e1
- Treatment
- combination of inorganic and organic sourcese4
- Outcome
- microbial populatione4
- Direction
- bettere4
- Qualifier
- during both the yearse4
- Setting
- Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”
e1“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”
e4“The combination of inorganic and organic sources led to significantly better microbial population along during both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum gross returns were obtained with transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Material
- Pant Arhar 291e1
- Treatment
- Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacinge5
- Outcome
- gross returnse5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Setting
- Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”
e1“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”
e5“The maximum gross returns were obtained in case of Transplanting at 90 x 40 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Among nutrient management practices, gross returns were highest with 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Material
- Pant Arhar 291e1
- Treatment
- 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1e6
- Outcome
- gross returnse6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Setting
- Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand)”
e1“The test variety of used was ‘Pant Arhar 291’”
e6“Among the nutrient management practices, the gross returns were highest with 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
For sustained productivity, pigeonpea can be transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacinge7
- Outcome
- sustained productivitye7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e7“Thus for sustained productivity of pigeon pea, it can be transplanted at 90 x 40 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1 could be taken as the most promising nutrient practice for the System of Pigeonpea Intensification.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1e2
- Outcome
- most promising practicese2
- Qualifier
- System of Pigeonpea Intensificatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
e2“for nutrient application integration of 50% RDF + Vermicompost at 2.5 ton ha-1 could be taken as the most promising practices for System of Pigeonpea Intensification”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →transplanting · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
23 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.