Paper · 1970 · Weed Science

Herbicides Applied as Liquid Sprays and Granules for Weed Control in Cotton

E. L. Robinson; O. B. Wooten; J. R. Williford

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of aqueous sprays and granules of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron), 1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)urea (fluometuron), isopropyl m -chlorocarbanilate (chlorpropham), α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin), and 2-chloro-2′, 6′-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide (alachlor) incorporated shallow for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., var. Stoneville 7A). In general, liquid formulation provided better weed control than did granular formulation. Applications of alachlor resulted in good weed control, but in a dry season the liquid spray form of the herbicide at high rates reduced the yield of cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid formulations generally provided better weed control than granular formulations.

Treatment
liquid formulatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
granular formulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, liquid formulation provided better weed control than did granular formulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor applications gave good weed control.

Treatment
Applications of alachlore0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of alachlor resulted in good weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a dry season, high-rate liquid alachlor reduced cotton yield.

Treatment
liquid spray form of the herbicide at high ratese0
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in a dry seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a dry season the liquid spray form of the herbicide at high rates reduced the yield of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–707 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applications of alachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–575 · show in text ↑

alachlor · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.