Paper · 2020 · Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Package Material and Pre-Storage Treatments on Viabilty of wheat Seed

El Siedy EL. H.; E. A. Rashwan; Amal H. Selim; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This research was conducted at Sakha Agric. Exp Station, Seed Technology Research Department, Field Crops ResearchInstitute, ARC, Giza, Egypt, during the period between 2018 and 2019 seasons, to evaluate the effect of packaging materials and pre-storage treatments on viability of wheat seed. The experimental design was a split- plot design with four replications. Seed samples were treated with malathion, phosphine, ficus powder and extract, clove powder and extract, camphor powder and extract and cupper nano -particles powder. Treated seeds were stored under open storage conditions for six months in Jute, Plastic and Polyethylene packages. The results revealed that, the type of package and treatments could provide special protection against seed deterioration namely; seed germination and seedling characters. The malathion and phosphine treatments could save the stored seed from the damage caused by insects, while cupper nano- particles treatment had a positive effect of controlling seed deterioration (germination capacity and seedling vigor). On the other hand, an experiment including similar treatments of the current research might be done to examine deteriorations which might take place to seeds stored for longer time (18 month).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging and treatments protected stored wheat seed germination and seedling traits against deterioration.

Treatment
type of package and treatmentse0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling characterse0
Direction
protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the type of package and treatments could provide special protection against seed deterioration namely; seed germination and seedling characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

malathion protected stored wheat seed from insect damage.

Treatment
malathione0
Interactor
insectsInsectae0pest
Outcome
damage caused by insectse0
Direction
savee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The malathion and phosphine treatments could save the stored seed from the damage caused by insects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

phosphine protected stored wheat seed from insect damage.

Treatment
phosphinee0
Interactor
insectsInsectae0pest
Outcome
damage caused by insectse0
Direction
savee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The malathion and phosphine treatments could save the stored seed from the damage caused by insects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles controlled seed deterioration, including germination capacity and seedling vigor.

Treatment
cupper nano- particles treatmente0
Outcome
seed deterioration (germination capacity and seedling vigor)e0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cupper nano- particles treatment had a positive effect of controlling seed deterioration (germination capacity and seedling vigor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphine · Insecta · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.