Abstract
Abstract In the study of the possible growth-stimulating effect p. Chaetomium sp on the grape seedlings survival and development, it was found that all varieties’ survival rate exceeded the control variant. It turned out to be the best in the Dostoyny variety. Seedlings the best growth and development is noted in the variant with the microorganisms used. Thus, the Kubanets shoot in variants 1 and 2 average lengths exceeded the control one by 15.1 cm and 13.3 cm, respectively. In the Gordiy variety, the difference between the control variant and the variants with the microorganisms use was 12.8 and 16.5 cm. The smallest difference between the control variant and variants using microorganisms on the growth average length is noted in the grade Dostoyny. The seedlings root system growth features to study in variants with the drug introduction based on the fungus p. Chaetomium sp. showed that the roots total number in the Worthy variety increases statistically. In the Kubanets variety, a significant difference is noted only between option 1 and the control. The Gordiy variety did not have a reliable difference in the experience options. Thus, the seedlings output that meets the quality standard, invariants with the drug use based on microorganisms p. Chaetomium sp. in the Dostoyny and Kubanets varieties, compared to the control option, was the greatest, which in the vaccinated seedlings’ production industrial technology will give a significant economic effect.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
All grape varieties had greater seedling survival than control with Chaetomium.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Treatment
- preparation based on the fungus p Chaetomium spt0
- Interactor
- Chaetomium sp
Chaetomiumt0symbiont - Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all varieties’ survival rate exceeded the control variant”
t0“Grape seedlings growth and development using a preparation based on the fungus p Chaetomium sp”
Claim · model-written summary
Dostoyny had the best survival rate.
Verbatim
e0“It turned out to be the best in the Dostoyny variety.”
e1“all varieties’ survival rate exceeded the control variant”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Microorganism use gave the best seedling growth and development.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Seedlings the best growth and development is noted in the variant with the microorganisms used.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Kubanets shoot length in variant 1 exceeded control by 15.1 cm.
Verbatim
e0“the Kubanets shoot in variants 1 and 2 average lengths exceeded the control one by 15.1 cm and 13.3 cm, respectively.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Kubanets shoot length in variant 2 exceeded control by 13.3 cm.
Verbatim
e0“the Kubanets shoot in variants 1 and 2 average lengths exceeded the control one by 15.1 cm and 13.3 cm, respectively.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Gordiy variant with microorganisms differed from control by 12.8 cm in shoot growth.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Material
- Gordiye0
- Treatment
- variants with the microorganisms usee0
- Outcome
- differencee0
- Value
- 12.8e0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“In the Gordiy variety, the difference between the control variant and the variants with the microorganisms use was 12.8 and 16.5 cm.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Gordiy second variant differed from control by 16.5 cm.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Material
- Gordiye0
- Treatment
- variants with the microorganisms usee0
- Outcome
- differencee0
- Value
- 16.5 cme0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“In the Gordiy variety, the difference between the control variant and the variants with the microorganisms use was 12.8 and 16.5 cm.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Dostoyny showed the smallest mean growth length difference from control.
Verbatim
e0“The smallest difference between the control variant and variants using microorganisms on the growth average length is noted in the grade Dostoyny.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Worthy root number increased statistically with the Chaetomium preparation.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Material
- Worthye0
- Treatment
- drug introduction based on the fungus p. Chaetomium sp.e1
- Interactor
- Chaetomium sp.Chaetomiume1symbiont
- Outcome
- roots total numbere0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the roots total number in the Worthy variety increases statistically.”
e1“drug introduction based on the fungus p. Chaetomium sp.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Kubanets root number differed significantly between option 1 and control.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“In the Kubanets variety, a significant difference is noted only between option 1 and the control.”
e1“the roots total number in the Worthy variety increases statistically.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Gordiy showed no reliable difference in root number across experimental options.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Material
- Gordiye0
- Treatment
- experience optionse0
- Outcome
- roots total numbere1
- Direction
- did not have a reliable differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The Gordiy variety did not have a reliable difference in the experience options.”
e1“the roots total number in the Worthy variety increases statistically.”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Dostoyny produced the greatest output of standard quality seedlings with the drug versus control.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Material
- Dostoynye0
- Treatment
- drug use based on microorganisms p. Chaetomium sp.e0
- Interactor
- Chaetomium sp.Chaetomiume0symbiont
- Outcome
- seedlings output that meets the quality standarde0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Comparator
- control optione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the seedlings output that meets the quality standard, invariants with the drug use based on microorganisms p. Chaetomium sp. in the Dostoyny and Kubanets varieties, compared to the control option, was the greatest”
t0“Grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Kubanets produced the greatest output of standard quality seedlings with the drug versus control.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Material
- Kubanetse0
- Treatment
- drug use based on microorganisms p. Chaetomium sp.e0
- Interactor
- Chaetomium sp.Chaetomiume0symbiont
- Outcome
- seedlings output that meets the quality standarde0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Comparator
- control optione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the seedlings output that meets the quality standard, invariants with the drug use based on microorganisms p. Chaetomium sp. in the Dostoyny and Kubanets varieties, compared to the control option, was the greatest”
t0“Grape seedlings”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →inoculation · quality: general · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.