Paper · 2010

Effects of N,P,and K Fertilizer Application on Cotton Grown in Saline Soil in Yellow River Delta

Xin Cheng

19
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is urgent and necessary to provide techniques of economic application on fertilizers for nutrition improvement of Bt cotton and cotton production in coastal saline soil in the Yellow River Delta.The experiments were conducted with Bt cotton cultivar SCRC28 in coastal saline soil in the Yellow River Delta,Shandong province.The effects of different amounts and ratios of N,P and K,and N and P fertilizers on nutrient(N,P,and K) assimilation,Na+ assimilation,net photosynthetic rate(Pn),dry matter accumulation and lint yield of Bt cotton were investigated in three types(low,middle,and high levels of salinity) of coastal saline field.The results showed that nutrient uptake of Bt cotton in the treatments of NP,NPK especially,in low,middle and high levels of salinity field was significantly higher than that in corresponding controls.And the Na+ uptake of cotton in the same treatments was significantly lower than that in corresponding controls.Nutrient use efficiency in agronomy(NUEa) of cotton in the NPK treatment in low,middle and high levels of salinity field was the highest among the three treatments.NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low,middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K,respectively.The coordination of N,P,and K fertilizers could maintain the highest leaf area,chlorophyll content and Pn among the three treatments in low,middle and high levels of salinity field,respectively.The biomass yield and lint yield of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low,middle and high levels of salinity field were also the highest among the three treatments,respectively.The lint yield in the NPK treatments in low,middle,and high levels of salinity field was increased by 2.53%,28.67% and 30.47% compared to the control,respectively,than that in corresponding controls.And the fertilization effects in middle and high levels of salinity field were obviously better than those in low level of salinity field.Further analysis indicated,rational fertilizer application,based on classification of soil salinity,was an effective way to alleviate nutrition obstacles of saline soil,improve cotton nutrition,and enhance the NUEa and cotton yield in coastal saline fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake of Bt cotton under NP and NPK treatments was significantly higher than in controls across low, middle and high salinity fields.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NP,NPKe0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
corresponding controlse0
Setting
low,middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake of Bt cotton in the treatments of NP,NPK especially,in low,middle and high levels of salinity field was significantly higher than that in corresponding controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ uptake of cotton under NP and NPK treatments was significantly lower than in controls.

Treatment
NP,NPKe0
Outcome
Na+ uptakee1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
corresponding controlse1
Setting
low,middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake of Bt cotton in the treatments of NP,NPK especially,in low,middle and high levels of salinity field was significantly higher than that in corresponding controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Na+ uptake of cotton in the same treatments was significantly lower than that in corresponding controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of cotton under NPK was the highest among the three treatments in low, middle and high salinity fields.

Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Direction
the higheste0
Comparator
the three treatmentse0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa) of cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was the highest among the three treatments”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 987–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in low salinity was 0.20 kg lint kg-1 N.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
0.20e0
Qualifier
kg lint kg-1 Ne0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in middle salinity was 1.95 kg lint kg-1 N.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
1.95e0
Qualifier
kg lint kg-1 Ne0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in high salinity was 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
2.07e0
Qualifier
kg lint kg-1 Ne0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in low salinity was 0.87 kg Lint kg-1 P.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
0.87e0
Qualifier
kg Lint kg-1 Pe0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in middle salinity was 8.35 kg Lint kg-1 P.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
8.35e0
Qualifier
kg Lint kg-1 Pe0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in high salinity was 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
8.71e0
Qualifier
kg Lint kg-1 Pe0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in low salinity was 0.26 kg Lint kg-1 K.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
0.26e0
Qualifier
kg Lint kg-1 Ke0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in middle salinity was 2.89 kg Lint kg-1 K.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
2.89e0
Qualifier
kg Lint kg-1 Ke0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUEa of Bt cotton under NPK in high salinity was 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
NUEae0
Value
3.77e0
Qualifier
kg Lint kg-1 Ke0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“NUEa of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field was 0.20,1.95,and 2.07 kg lint kg-1 N,0.87,8.35,and 8.71 kg Lint kg-1 P,and 0.26,2.89,and 3.77 kg Lint kg-1 K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1115–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N, P and K fertilisation maintained the highest leaf area, chlorophyll content and Pn among the three treatments in low, middle and high salinity fields.

Treatment
coordination of N,P,and K fertilizerse0
Outcome
leaf area,chlorophyll content and Pne0
Direction
the higheste0
Comparator
the three treatmentse0
Setting
low,middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cotton Grown in Saline Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The coordination of N,P,and K fertilizers could maintain the highest leaf area,chlorophyll content and Pn among the three treatments in low,middle and high levels of salinity field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass and lint yield of Bt cotton under NPK were the highest among the three treatments in all three salinity fields.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
biomass yield and lint yielde0
Direction
the higheste0
Comparator
the three treatmentse0
Setting
low, middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass yield and lint yield of Bt cotton in the NPK treatment in low, middle and high levels of salinity field were also the highest among the three treatments”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1519–1682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased lint yield of cotton by 2.53% in low salinity field compared with the control.

Treatment
NPK treatmentse0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.53%e0
Qualifier
lowe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cotton Grown in Saline Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lint yield in the NPK treatments in low,middle,and high levels of salinity field was increased by 2.53%,28.67% and 30.47% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased lint yield of cotton by 28.67% in middle salinity field compared with the control.

Treatment
NPK treatmentse0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.67%e0
Qualifier
middlee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cotton Grown in Saline Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lint yield in the NPK treatments in low,middle,and high levels of salinity field was increased by 2.53%,28.67% and 30.47% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased lint yield of cotton by 30.47% in high salinity field compared with the control.

Treatment
NPK treatmentse0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.47%e0
Qualifier
highe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cotton Grown in Saline Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lint yield in the NPK treatments in low,middle,and high levels of salinity field was increased by 2.53%,28.67% and 30.47% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilisation effects on cotton were obviously better in middle and high salinity fields than in low salinity field.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
fertilization effectse0
Direction
obviously bettere0
Comparator
low level of salinity fielde0
Setting
middle and high levels of salinity fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cotton Grown in Saline Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the fertilization effects in middle and high levels of salinity field were obviously better than those in low level of salinity field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2032 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend rational fertilizer application based on soil salinity classification to alleviate nutrition obstacles of saline soil for cotton.

Treatment
rational fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
alleviate nutrition obstacles of saline soile0
Setting
coastal saline fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rational fertilizer application,based on classification of soil salinity,was an effective way to alleviate nutrition obstacles of saline soil,improve cotton nutrition,and enhance the NUEa and cotton yield in coastal saline fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2060–2289 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · physiology: ion balance · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.