Paper · 2014 · 农业科学学报:英文版

The Relative Contribution of Non-Foliar Organs of Cotton to Yield and Related Physiological Characteristics Under Water Deficit

Hu; Yuanyuan; Zhang; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water defi cit is one of the most important causes of decreased yield in cultivated plants. Non-foliar green organs in cotton play an important role in yield formation at the late growth stage. Although better photosynthetic performance was observed in a non-foliar organ(bract) compared with leaves under water defi cit. However, the physiological response of each organ in cotton to water defi cit has not been comprehensively studied in relation to the water status and photosynthesis characteristics. We studied the maintenance of water status of each organ in cotton by measuring their relative water content, proline content and stomatal characteristics. Water defi cit signifi cantly decreased the surface area of each organ, but to a lesser extent in non-foliar organs. Our results showed that the relative contribution of biomass accumulation of non-foliar organs increased under water defi cit. Non-foliar organs(bracts and capsule wall) showed less ontogenetic decrease in O2 evolution capacity and in RuBPC activity(per dry weight) as well as better antioxidant systems than leaves at various days after anthesis. We conclude that the photosynthesis from non-foliar organs is important for increasing cotton yield especially under water defi cit conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly decreased surface area of each cotton organ.

Treatment
Water defi cite0
Outcome
surface area of each organe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water defi cit signifi cantly decreased the surface area of each organ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased non-foliar organ surface area less than other organs.

Organ / stage
non-foliar organse0
Treatment
Water defi cite0
Outcome
surface area of each organe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
to a lesser extente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water defi cit signifi cantly decreased the surface area of each organ, but to a lesser extent in non-foliar organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative biomass contribution of non-foliar organs increased under water deficit.

Treatment
water defi cite0
Outcome
relative contribution of biomass accumulation of non-foliar organse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative contribution of biomass accumulation of non-foliar organs increased under water defi cit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bracts and capsule walls showed less ontogenetic decline in O2 evolution capacity than leaves.

Organ / stage
bracts and capsule walle0
Outcome
O2 evolution capacitye0
Direction
less ontogenetic decreasee0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-foliar organs(bracts and capsule wall) showed less ontogenetic decrease in O2 evolution capacity and in RuBPC activity(per dry weight) as well as better antioxidant systems than leaves at various days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bracts and capsule walls showed less ontogenetic decline in RuBPC activity than leaves.

Organ / stage
bracts and capsule walle0
Gene
RuBPCe0
Outcome
RuBPC activity(per dry weight)e0
Direction
less ontogenetic decreasee0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-foliar organs(bracts and capsule wall) showed less ontogenetic decrease in O2 evolution capacity and in RuBPC activity(per dry weight) as well as better antioxidant systems than leaves at various days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bracts and capsule walls had better antioxidant systems than leaves.

Organ / stage
bracts and capsule walle0
Outcome
antioxidant systemse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-foliar organs(bracts and capsule wall) showed less ontogenetic decrease in O2 evolution capacity and in RuBPC activity(per dry weight) as well as better antioxidant systems than leaves at various days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded non-foliar photosynthesis is important for cotton yield, especially under water deficit.

Organ / stage
non-foliar organse0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthesis from non-foliar organs is important for increasing cotton yield especially under water defi cit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1268 · show in text ↑